ReviewDrugs & aging2013
Avanafil: a review of its use in patients with erectile dysfunction.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Bioequivalence Study of Avanafil in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: Results of a Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, 2-Sequence, 2-Period Crossover Study.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2021Trial
- Identification, synthesis and characterization of avanafil process impurities and determination by UPLC.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Formulation and Optimization of Avanafil Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles: A Single-Dose Clinical Pharmacokinetic Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- [Side effects of erectile dysfunction drug treatment].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Article
- Everything you ever wanted to know about phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and the heart (but never dared ask): How do they work?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2016Review
- Development and evaluation of avanafil self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system with rapid onset of action and enhanced bioavailability.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2015Article
- Avanafil Inhibits the Contractility of the Isolated Caprine Detrusor Muscle.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avanafil (STENDRA™, SPEDRA™, Zepeeed™) is an oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Avanafil is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 30 to 45 min. In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial in patients with erectile dysfunction, avanafil 50, 100 and 200 mg recipients had significantly greater improvements from baseline than placebo recipients in mean international index of erectile dysfunction-erectile function domain scores and in successful vaginal penetration and sexual intercourse attempts (coprimary endpoints). Treatment effects were significantly larger in avanafil 100 and 200 mg recipients than 50 mg recipients. For avanafil recipients, approximately two-thirds of attempts at sexual intercourse that were made prior to 15 min, or more than 6 h, after drug administration were successful, compared with approximately one-quarter of attempts made during these time periods by placebo recipients. In trials in patients with erectile dysfunction in association with diabetes mellitus, and after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, avanafil 100 or 200 mg was significantly more efficacious than placebo for primary and most secondary endpoints. Avanafil was generally well tolerated in the above-mentioned studies. In a pooled analysis of three clinical trials, ≤2 % of avanafil and placebo recipients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. During extended treatment with avanafil for >52 weeks, 2.8 % of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse reactions and there were no drug-related serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.