Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23955163›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2013

[Proximal femoral fractures in the German external quality assurance module 17/1: reasons for delay in surgery].

T Ruffing, D Klein, P Huchzermeier, H Winkler, M Muhm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of the effects of a delay of surgery in patients with hip fractures: outcome and causes.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mortality after proximal femur fracture with a delay of surgery of more than 48 h.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T RuffingKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie 1, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Hellmut-Hartert-Strasse 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland. thomas@ruffing.eu
D Klein
P Huchzermeier
H Winkler
M Muhm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the quality indicator "preoperative stay" a part of the external quality assurance for proximal femoral fractures (module 17/1), a tolerance range for surgery within 48 h after admission of ≤ 15 % is given. MATERIALS AND

methodsOver a period of 5 years all cases were analyzed with respect to reasons for delayed surgery of more than 48 h after admission.

resultsA total of 165 patients (16%) out of 1,036 documented cases had surgery later than 48 h after admission. Reasons were pathological bleeding, preoperative poor general condition, lack of informed consent, intake of metformin and lacking initial radiological detection of fractures. Due to a lack of software-related specifications in ten patients a wrong preoperative length of stay was generated.

conclusionThe significance of the quality indicator "preoperative stay" without division into whether this was administrative or patient-related must be considered critically. For fall-related fractures in hospital the time of the accident or diagnosis should be considered.

Indexed as

Preoperative PeriodWaiting ListsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantLength of StayMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.