Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23955093›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab amplifies and shapes tumor-specific immunity when applied to gastric cancer patients in the adjuvant setting.

Djordje Atanackovic, Henrike Reinhard, Sabrina Meyer, Stefanie Spöck, Tobias Grob, Tim Luetkens, Sara Yousef, Yanran Cao, York Hildebrandt, Julia Templin and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CD4 T-Cell Subsets and the Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Djordje AtanackovicDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Henrike ReinhardDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Sabrina MeyerDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Stefanie SpöckDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias GrobInstitute for Pathology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Tim LuetkensDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Sara YousefDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Yanran CaoDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
York HildebrandtDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Julia TemplinDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin BartelsDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Nesrine LajmiDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Heribert StoiberDivision of Virology; Medical University IBK; Innsbruck, Austria.
Nicolaus KrögerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Judith AtzFresenius Biotech GmbH; Munich, Germany.
Diane SeimetzFresenius Biotech GmbH; Munich, Germany.
Jakob R IzbickiDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerDepartment of Internal Medicine II; Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplantation with the section Pneumology; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DENeovii Biotech (Germany) · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with gastric cancer benefit from perioperative chemotherapy, however, treatment is toxic and many patients will relapse. The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab targets EpCAM on tumor cells, CD3 on T cells, and the Fcγ-receptor of antigen-presenting cells. While in Europe catumaxomab is approved for treating malignant ascites, it has not been investigated in the perioperative setting and its exact immunological mode of action is unclear.

methodsIn our study, gastric cancer patients received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, one intraoperative application of catumaxomab, and 4 postoperative doses of intraperitoneal catumaxomab. Immunomonitoring was performed in 6 patients before surgery, after completion of catumaxomab treatment, and one month later.

resultsIntraperitoneal application of catumaxomab caused an increased expression of activation markers on the patients' T cells. This was accompanied by a transient decrease in numbers of CXCR3(+) effector T cells with a T-helper (Th)-1 phenotype in the peripheral blood. All patients evidenced pre-existing EpCAM-specific CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells. While these cells transiently disappeared from the blood stream after intraperitoneal application of catumaxomab, we detected increased numbers of peripheral EpCAM-specific cells and a modified EpCAM-specific T-cell repertoire 4 weeks after completion of treatment. Finally, catumaxomab also amplified humoral immunity to tumor antigens other than EpCAM.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that catumaxomab exerts its clinical effects by (1) activating peripheral T cells, (2) redistributing effector T cells from the blood into peripheral tissues, (3) expanding and shaping of the pre-existing EpCAM-specific T-cell repertoire, and (4) spreading of anti-tumor immunity to different tumor antigens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificEuropeHumansImmunologic FactorsStomach NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificcatumaxomabImmunologic Factorsadjuvant immunotherapycatumaxomabEpCAMgastric cancerT cellstumor immunology

Identifiers

PMID23955093
PMCPMC4162043
OpenAlexW1966778578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.