Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23954609›Full record

ArticleJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association

Safety of protocol violations in acute stroke tPA administration.

Michael J Lyerly, Karen C Albright, Amelia K Boehme, Reza Bavarsad Shahripour, James T Houston, Pawan V Rawal, Niren Kapoor, Muhammad Alvi, April Sisson, Anne W Alexandrov and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J LyerlyDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: mjlyerly@uab.edu.
Karen C AlbrightDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Health Services and Outcomes Research Center for Outcome and Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Center for Excellence in Comparative Effectiveness Research for Eliminating Disparities, Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Amelia K BoehmeDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Reza Bavarsad ShahripourDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
James T HoustonDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Pawan V RawalDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Niren KapoorDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Muhammad AlviDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
April SissonDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Anne W AlexandrovDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Andrei V AlexandrovDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING COREP60MD000502 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2003 to 2016
$16.2M
UAB Health Services Research (HSR) Training ProgramT32HS013852 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEVITAN, EMILY B, MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2024
$8.0M
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007153 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GU, YIAN, WILLEY, JOSHUA ZEBADIAH · 1987 to 2023
$6.2M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000502NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator remains the only approved therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the United States; however, less than 10% of patients receive treatment. This is partially because of the large number of contraindications, narrow treatment window, and physician reluctance to deviate from these criteria.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who received IV thrombolysis at our stroke center for National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) protocol violations and rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Other outcome variables included systemic hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale at discharge, and discharge disposition.

resultsA total of 212 patients were identified in our stroke registry between 2009 and 2011 and included in the analysis. Protocol violations occurred in 76 patients (36%). The most common violations were thrombolysis beyond 3 hours (26%), aggressive blood pressure management (15%), elevated prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (6.6%), minor or resolving deficits (4.2%), unclear time of onset (3.9%), and stroke within 3 months (3%). There were no significant differences in any of the safety outcomes or discharge disposition between patients with or without protocol violations. Controlling for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, and glucose on admission, there was no significant increase in sICH (odds ratio: 3.8; 95% confidence interval: .37-38.72) in the patients who had protocol violations.

conclusionsDespite more than one third of patients receiving thrombolysis with protocol violations, overall rates of hemorrhage remained low and did not differ from those who did not have violations. Our data support the need to expand access to thrombolysis in AIS patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Coagulation TestsChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsGuideline AdherenceHemorrhageHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen ActivatorAcute ischemic strokepatient safetyprotocol violationsymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhagethrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID23954609
PMCPMC4602367
OpenAlexW2034358744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.