Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23954306›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2013

Plasticity in the contribution of T cell receptor variable region residues to binding of peptide-HLA-A2 complexes.

Sheena N Smith, Daniel Sommermeyer, Kurt H Piepenbrink, Sydney J Blevins, Helga Bernhard, Wolfgang Uckert, Brian M Baker, David M Kranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering Proteins by Combining Deep Mutational Scanning and Yeast Display.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  2. T-cell Receptors EngineeredCancer immunology research · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. T Cell Receptor Engineering and Analysis Using the Yeast Display Platform.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheena N SmithDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, 600 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Daniel Sommermeyer
Kurt H Piepenbrink
Sydney J Blevins
Helga Bernhard
Wolfgang Uckert
Brian M Baker
David M Kranz

Funding

Protein Expression and Peptide CoreP01CA097296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 2003 to 2012
$15.0M
Training Program in Chemistry-Interface with BiologyT32GM070421 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HERGENROTHER, PAUL · 2005 to 2019
$5.4M
Physical Basis for T Cell Receptor Binding and ActivityR01GM067079 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI BAKER, BRIAN M · 2003 to 2015
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA097296NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067079NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM070421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hypothesis accounting for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction by T cell receptors (TCRs) holds that there are several evolutionary conserved residues in TCR variable regions that contact MHC. While this "germline codon" hypothesis is supported by various lines of evidence, it has been difficult to test. The difficulty stems in part from the fact that TCRs exhibit low affinities for pep/MHC, thus limiting the range of binding energies that can be assigned to these key interactions using mutational analyses. To measure the magnitude of binding energies involved, here we used high-affinity TCRs engineered by mutagenesis of CDR3. The TCRs included a high-affinity, MART-1/HLA-A2-specific single-chain TCR and two other high-affinity TCRs that all contain the same Vα region and recognize the same MHC allele (HLA-A2), with different peptides and Vβ regions. Mutational analysis of residues in CDR1 and CDR2 of the three Vα2 regions showed the importance of the key germline codon residue Y51. However, two other proposed key residues showed significant differences among the TCRs in their relative contributions to binding. With the use of single-position, yeast-display libraries in two of the key residues, MART-1/HLA-A2 selections also revealed strong preferences for wild-type germline codon residues, but several alternative residues could also accommodate binding and, hence, MHC restriction. Thus, although a single residue (Y51) could account for a proportion of the energy associated with positive selection (i.e., MHC restriction), there is significant plasticity in requirements for particular side chains in CDR1 and CDR2 and in their relative binding contributions among different TCRs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCell Surface Display TechniquesComplementarity Determining RegionsGene ExpressionHLA-A2 AntigenHumansMART-1 AntigenModels, MolecularMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPeptidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaSingle-Chain AntibodiesSolubilityComplementarity Determining RegionsHLA-A2 AntigenMART-1 AntigenPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaSingle-Chain AntibodiesCDRcomplementarity-determining regiondirected evolutiongermline codon biasmajor histocompatibility complexMHCsingle-chainSOEsplicing by overlap extensionSPRsurface plasmon resonanceT cell receptorT cell receptorsTCRyeast display

Identifiers

PMID23954306
PMCPMC3844621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.