Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23952342›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013

Platform for high-throughput testing of the effect of soluble compounds on 3D cell cultures.

Frédérique Deiss, Aaron Mazzeo, Estrella Hong, Donald E Ingber, Ratmir Derda, George M Whitesides

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unmasking molecular profiles of bladder cancer.Investigative and clinical urology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frédérique DeissDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Aaron Mazzeo
Estrella Hong
Donald E Ingber
Ratmir Derda
George M Whitesides
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Nano-Scale Tools for Use in Cell BiologyR01ES016665 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WHITESIDES, GEORGE M · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES 016665NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro 3D culture could provide an important model of tissues in vivo, but assessing the effects of chemical compounds on cells in specific regions of 3D culture requires physical isolation of cells and thus currently relies mostly on delicate and low-throughput methods. This paper describes a technique ("cells-in-gels-in-paper", CiGiP) that permits rapid assembly of arrays of 3D cell cultures and convenient isolation of cells from specific regions of these cultures. The 3D cultures were generated by stacking sheets of 200-μm-thick paper, each sheet supporting 96 individual "spots" (thin circular slabs) of hydrogels containing cells, separated by hydrophobic material (wax, PDMS) impermeable to aqueous solutions, and hydrophilic and most hydrophobic solutes. A custom-made 96-well holder isolated the cell-containing zones from each other. Each well contained media to which a different compound could be added. After culture and disassembly of the holder, peeling the layers apart "sectioned" the individual 3D cultures into 200-μm-thick sections which were easy to analyze using 2D imaging (e.g., with a commercial gel scanner). This 96-well holder brings new utilities to high-throughput, cell-based screening, by combining the simplicity of CiGiP with the convenience of a microtiter plate. This work demonstrated the potential of this type of assays by examining the cytotoxic effects of phenylarsine oxide (PAO) and cyclophosphamide (CPA) on human breast cancer cells positioned at different separations from culture media in 3D cultures.

Indexed as

PaperCell Culture TechniquesCell SurvivalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumans

Identifiers

PMID23952342
PMCPMC3810953
OpenAlexW2140032108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.