ArticleBoneKEy reports2012
The need for mouse models in osteoporosis genetics research.
Article in BoneKEy reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Progress of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Generating Mouse/Zebrafish Models of Human Skeletal Diseases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- Genetic regulation of bone strength: a review of animal model studies.BoneKEy reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis, the progressive loss of bone mass resulting in fragility fractures, affects ∼75 million people in the United States, Europe and Japan. Bone mineral density (BMD) correlates with fracture risk and is widely used in clinical settings to predict fracture. Numerous studies have demonstrated that peak bone mass is highly heritable and consequently a number of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been conducted to identify the genes that regulate BMD. Traditional intercross mapping in the mouse has met with limited successes in the field of skeletal biology. With the advent of human GWAS, questions have arisen about the continued need for mouse models in genetics research. However, significant advances have been made in the field of mouse genetics, including new genetics resource populations and loci mapping techniques, which enable gene-level mapping resolution. In this review, we discuss the need for mouse models to help understand the skeletal biology underlying novel human GWAS findings, how loci discovered in the mouse can be used to complement GWAS analysis and highlight the recent advances made in the field of skeletal biology from the use of these new and developing resources. We conclude this paper with a discussion of the need for systems-level approaches in the skeletal biology field, with an emphasis on the need for pathway and network analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.