ArticlePloS one2013
Bilateral descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis in rats.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-range circuit of the mouse spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- The effect of hesperidin on trigeminal nerve damage in an NTG-induced migraine model: the role of the TRPV1 channel.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- The role and interaction of hypothalamic-related neurotransmitters in migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Cycling sensitivity across migraine phases: A longitudinal case-control study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
- Potential hypothalamic mechanisms in trigeminal neuropathic pain: a comparative analysis with migraine and cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- Oxytocin shortens spreading depolarization-induced periorbital allodynia.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Hypothalamic Paraventricular Stimulation Inhibits Nociceptive Wide Dynamic Range Trigeminocervical Complex Cells via Oxytocinergic Transmission.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Review
- Changes in the analgesic mechanism of oxytocin can contribute to hyperalgesia in Parkinson's disease model rats.PloS one · 2024Article
- Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- From Determining Brain Insulin Resistance in a Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Model to Exploring the Region-Dependent Effect of Intranasal Insulin.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Is PTSD-Phenotype Associated with HPA-Axis Sensitivity? Feedback Inhibition and Other Modulating Factors of Glucocorticoid Signaling Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide facilitates sensitization of the vestibular nucleus in a rat model of chronic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2020Article
- A Pre-Existing Myogenic Temporomandibular Disorder Increases Trigeminal Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Enhances Nitroglycerin-Induced Hypersensitivity in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Dimethyl fumarate alleviates the nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced migraine in mice.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2020Article
- Properties of neurons in the superficial laminae of trigeminal nucleus caudalis.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- CGRP and the Trigeminal System in Migraine.Headache · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several lines of evidence suggest that the hypothalamus is involved in trigeminal pain processing. However, the organization of descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) remains poorly understood. Microinjections of the retrograde tracer, fluorogold (FG), into the Sp5C, in rats, reveal that five hypothalamic nuclei project to the Sp5C: the paraventricular nucleus, the lateral hypothalamic area, the perifornical hypothalamic area, the A11 nucleus and the retrochiasmatic area. Descending hypothalamic projections to the Sp5C are bilateral, except those from the paraventricular nucleus which exhibit a clear ipsilateral predominance. Moreover, the density of retrogradely FG-labeled neurons in the hypothalamus varies according to the dorso-ventral localization of the Sp5C injection site. There are much more labeled neurons after injections into the ventrolateral part of the Sp5C (where ophthalmic afferents project) than after injections into its dorsomedial or intermediate parts (where mandibular and maxillary afferents, respectively, project). These results demonstrate that the organization of descending hypothalamic projections to the spinal dorsal horn and Sp5C are different. Whereas the former are ipsilateral, the latter are bilateral. Moreover, hypothalamic projections to the Sp5C display somatotopy, suggesting that these projections are preferentially involved in the processing of meningeal and cutaneous inputs from the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve in rats. Therefore, our results suggest that the control of trigeminal and spinal dorsal horn processing of nociceptive information by hypothalamic neurons is different and raise the question of the role of bilateral, rather than unilateral, hypothalamic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.