ArticlePLoS genetics2013
Re-ranking sequencing variants in the post-GWAS era for accurate causal variant identification.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of post-GWAS studies in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2025Review
- kGWASflow: a modular, flexible, and reproducible Snakemake workflow for k-mers-based GWAS.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Methods for statistical fine-mapping and their applications to auto-immune diseases.Seminars in immunopathology · 2022Review
- Identifying causal variants by fine mapping across multiple studies.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals the Genetic Architecture of Seed Vigor in Oats.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Intrinsic DNA topology as a prioritization metric in genomic fine-mapping studies.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Sequence-based GWAS, network and pathway analyses reveal genes co-associated with milk cheese-making properties and milk composition in Montbéliarde cows.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Identification of 55,000 Replicated DNA Methylation QTL.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Two-phase designs for joint quantitative-trait-dependent and genotype-dependent sampling in post-GWAS regional sequencing.Genetic epidemiology · 2018Article
- DNA and RNA-sequence based GWAS highlights membrane-transport genes as key modulators of milk lactose content.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Linkage disequilibrium-dependent architecture of human complex traits shows action of negative selection.Nature genetics · 2017Article
- Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Illustrating, Quantifying, and Correcting for Bias in Post-hoc Analysis of Gene-Based Rare Variant Tests of Association.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Sequence-based Association Analysis Reveals an MGST1 eQTL with Pleiotropic Effects on Bovine Milk Composition.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Tissue-specific regulatory circuits reveal variable modular perturbations across complex diseases.Nature methods · 2016Article
- Genetic Variant Selection: Learning Across Traits and Sites.Genetics · 2016Article
- GWASdb v2: an update database for human genetic variants identified by genome-wide association studies.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Resampling to Address the Winner's Curse in Genetic Association Analysis of Time to Event.Genetic epidemiology · 2015Article
- Next-generation sequencing-based genome diagnostics across clinical genetics centers: implementation choices and their effects.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite.Nature genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Next generation sequencing has dramatically increased our ability to localize disease-causing variants by providing base-pair level information at costs increasingly feasible for the large sample sizes required to detect complex-trait associations. Yet, identification of causal variants within an established region of association remains a challenge. Counter-intuitively, certain factors that increase power to detect an associated region can decrease power to localize the causal variant. First, combining GWAS with imputation or low coverage sequencing to achieve the large sample sizes required for high power can have the unintended effect of producing differential genotyping error among SNPs. This tends to bias the relative evidence for association toward better genotyped SNPs. Second, re-use of GWAS data for fine-mapping exploits previous findings to ensure genome-wide significance in GWAS-associated regions. However, using GWAS findings to inform fine-mapping analysis can bias evidence away from the causal SNP toward the tag SNP and SNPs in high LD with the tag. Together these factors can reduce power to localize the causal SNP by more than half. Other strategies commonly employed to increase power to detect association, namely increasing sample size and using higher density genotyping arrays, can, in certain common scenarios, actually exacerbate these effects and further decrease power to localize causal variants. We develop a re-ranking procedure that accounts for these adverse effects and substantially improves the accuracy of causal SNP identification, often doubling the probability that the causal SNP is top-ranked. Application to the NCI BPC3 aggressive prostate cancer GWAS with imputation meta-analysis identified a new top SNP at 2 of 3 associated loci and several additional possible causal SNPs at these loci that may have otherwise been overlooked. This method is simple to implement using R scripts provided on the author's website.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.