ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Ultrasensitivity in phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycles with little substrate.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Many will enter, few will win: Cost and sensitivity of exploratory dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Dynamics and Sensitivity of Signaling Pathways.Current pathobiology reports · 2022Article
- Crosstalk and ultrasensitivity in protein degradation pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The Influence of Molecular Reach and Diffusivity on the Efficacy of Membrane-Confined Reactions.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- When More Is Less: Dual Phosphorylation Protects Signaling Off State against Overexpression.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Enzyme sequestration by the substrate: An analysis in the deterministic and stochastic domains.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- The natural history of molecular functions inferred from an extensive phylogenomic analysis of gene ontology data.PloS one · 2017Article
- Enzyme Sequestration as a Tuning Point in Controlling Response Dynamics of Signalling Networks.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Multisite Phosphorylation Modulates the T Cell Receptor ζ-Chain Potency but not the Switchlike Response.Biophysical journal · 2016Article
- BioJazz: in silico evolution of cellular networks with unbounded complexity using rule-based modeling.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Reciprocal regulation as a source of ultrasensitivity in two-component systems with a bifunctional sensor kinase.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Compact modeling of allosteric multisite proteins: application to a cell size checkpoint.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular decision-making is driven by dynamic behaviours, such as the preparations for sunrise enabled by circadian rhythms and the choice of cell fates enabled by positive feedback. Such behaviours are often built upon ultrasensitive responses where a linear change in input generates a sigmoidal change in output. Phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycles are one means to generate ultrasensitivity. Using bioinformatics, we show that in vivo levels of kinases and phosphatases frequently exceed the levels of their corresponding substrates in budding yeast. This result is in contrast to the conditions often required by zero-order ultrasensitivity, perhaps the most well known means for how such cycles become ultrasensitive. We therefore introduce a mechanism to generate ultrasensitivity when numbers of enzymes are higher than numbers of substrates. Our model combines distributive and non-distributive actions of the enzymes with two-stage binding and concerted allosteric transitions of the substrate. We use analytical and numerical methods to calculate the Hill number of the response. For a substrate with [Formula: see text] phosphosites, we find an upper bound of the Hill number of [Formula: see text], and so even systems with a single phosphosite can be ultrasensitive. Two-stage binding, where an enzyme must first bind to a binding site on the substrate before it can access the substrate's phosphosites, allows the enzymes to sequester the substrate. Such sequestration combined with competition for each phosphosite provides an intuitive explanation for the sigmoidal shifts in levels of phosphorylated substrate. Additionally, we find cases for which the response is not monotonic, but shows instead a peak at intermediate levels of input. Given its generality, we expect the mechanism described by our model to often underlay decision-making circuits in eukaryotic cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.