ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2013
Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9).
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03537352 (Shared Decision Making in Patients With Surgical or Non-Surgical Diseases in a General Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Shared Decision Making in Patients With Surgical or Non-Surgical Diseases in a General Hospital: A Pilot Study
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared decision making PLUS - a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).BMC psychiatry · 2017Trial
- From knowledge to action: a blended training to enhance shared decision making skills in primary care physicians - a pilot study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Views on an antipsychotic regimen administered once every 2 months: a qualitative interview study of people living with bipolar I disorder, caregivers, and prescribers in the USA and Canada.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- Putting measurement-based care into action: a multi-method study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Patient leaflets on respiratory tract infections did not improve shared decision making and antibiotic prescriptions in a low-prescriber setting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Perspectives of Patients and Providers in Using Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Independence of Coping Styles With the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Shared Decision-Making in People With Parkinson's Disease.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Five Golden Rings to Measure Patient-Centered Care in Rheumatology.Arthritis care & research · 2020Review
- The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression.The patient · 2020Review
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- What can clinicians do to improve outcomes across psychiatric treatments: a conceptual review of non-specific components.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019Review
- Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Article
- Giving Patients Choices During Involuntary Admission: A New Intervention.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
- Validating patient and physician versions of the shared decision making questionnaire in oncology setting.Health promotion perspectives · 2019Article
- Prospective analysis of psychological differences between adult and elderly cancer patients during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018Article
- Implementing CommonGround in a community mental health center: Lessons in a computerized decision support system.Psychiatric rehabilitation journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo measure and compare the extent to which shared a decision making (SDM) process is implemented both in psychiatric outpatient clinical encounters and in the primary care setting from the patient's perspective.
methodsA total of 1,477 patients recruited from the Canary Islands Health Service mental health and primary care departments were invited to complete the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) immediately after their consultation. MANCOVA, Student's t-test, and Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship and differences between SDM-Q-9 scores in patient samples.
resultsNo differences were found in SDM-Q-9 total scores between the two patient samples, but there were relevant differences when item by item analysis was applied; differences were observed according to the different steps of the SDM process. SDM is present to a very limited extent in the routine psychiatric setting compared to primary care. Patients' age, education, type of appointment, and treatment decision all play a specific role in predicting SDM.
conclusionThe study provides evidence that SDM is a complex process that needs to be analyzed according to its different steps. SDM patterns were different in the primary care and psychiatric outpatient care settings and reflect quite a different perspective of the decision making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.