ReviewMusculoskeletal surgery2013
Femoroacetabular impingement: role of imaging.
Review in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-observer concordance in normal and pathological findings of the hip joint in plain radiographs.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- Sex differences in the prevalence of radiographic findings of structural hip deformities in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021Article
- Interchangeability of CT and 3D "pseudo-CT" MRI for preoperative planning in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.Skeletal radiology · 2020Article
- Orthopaedic surgeons' use and knowledge of ionizing radiation during surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- A 3D active model framework for segmentation of proximal femur in MR images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2015Article
- Acetabular posterior wall morphology. A CT-based method to distinguish two acetabular posterior wall types.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an impingement characterized by repetitive abutment between the femur and the acetabular rim during hip motion due to loss of joint clearance (Imam and Khanduja in Int Orthop 35(10):1427-1435, 2011; James et al. in AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(6):1412-1419, 2006). Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be classified as either cam or pincer type, and it can be differentiated on the basis of a predominance of either a femoral or an acetabular abnormality (Pfirrmann et al. in Radiology 244(2):626, 2007; Ganz et al. in Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):264-272, 2008). In cases of cam FAI, the nonspherical shape of the femoral head at the femoral head-neck junction and reduced depth of the femoral waist lead to abutment of the femoral head-neck junction against the acetabular rim. In cases of pincer FAI, acetabular overcoverage limits the range of motion and leads to a conflict between the acetabulum and the femur. The most important role of preoperative MR evaluation in patients affected by FAI is the accurate assessment of the damage's extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23949933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.