Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23949739›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Palonosetron and prednisolone for the prevention of nausea and emesis during fractionated radiotherapy and 5 cycles of concomitant weekly cisplatin-a phase II study.

Christina H Ruhlmann, Charlotte Belli, Tina Dahl, Jørn Herrstedt

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV): MASCC/ESMO guideline for antiemetics in radiotherapy: update 2009.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of antiemetic studies for radiation-induced nausea and vomiting within an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  9. Recent advances in antiemetics: new formulations of 5HTCancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina H RuhlmannDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Charlotte Belli
Tina Dahl
Jørn Herrstedt
Herlev Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecommendations for antiemetic prophylaxis supportive to radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy are not evidence-based. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the antiemetic regimen concurrent to fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin in two Danish departments of oncology.

methodsPatients with gynecological cancer scheduled to receive fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) were asked to complete a study diary in order to assess episodes of emesis, grade of nausea, and use of rescue antiemetic treatment daily during 5 weeks of treatment. Antiemetic treatment consisted of palonosetron and prednisolone. A patient had completed the study if emesis occurred or if 5 weeks of treatment were accomplished without emesis. The primary endpoint was sustained no emesis during 5 weeks of treatment.

resultsA total of 48 patients completed 155 weekly cycles of radiotherapy, concomitant weekly cisplatin, and antiemetic prophylaxis. The probability of completing 5 cycles without emesis (sustained no emesis) was 57 %. During cycle 1, 42 % of the patients were free from nausea. After 5 cycles, only 23 % of patients were continuously free from nausea. One half of the patients used rescue antiemetic treatment at least once during the 5 cycles.

conclusionThe present study demonstrates that an antiemetic prophylaxis consisting of palonosetron and prednisolone is insufficient for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin in patients treated for gynecological cancer. The addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist should be investigated in a randomized, double-blind study in this setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesMiddle AgedNauseaPalonosetronPrednisoloneAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinIsoquinolinesPalonosetronPrednisoloneQuinuclidines

Identifiers

PMID23949739
OpenAlexW2056548469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.