Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23949702›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2013

Nutrition support during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adults: a retrospective audit of 86 patients.

Suzie Ferrie, Robert Herkes, Paul Forrest

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzie FerrieIntensive Care Service, Critical Care Dietitian, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia, suzie.ferrie@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Robert Herkes
Paul Forrest
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used to support critically ill patients with severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure. It has been claimed that the resulting haemodynamic alterations, particularly in venoarterial ECMO, mean that enteral feeding is unsafe and/or poorly tolerated. This study aims to investigate this question and to identify any barriers to optimal nutrition.

methodsData were retrospectively collected for 86 patients who received ECMO between January 2007 and July 2012 in a tertiary critical care unit/ECMO referral centre. All were fed using existing protocols that emphasise early enteral feeding in preference over parenteral or delayed enteral nutrition.

resultsThirty-one patients required ECMO for cardiac failure, and all of these received venoarterial ECMO; the remainder received venovenous ECMO. Enteral feeds started for all patients at average 13.1 h [standard deviation (SD) 16.7 h] after ICU admission, reaching goal rate on day 2.6 (SD 1.4). Thirty-three patients experienced significant feeding intolerance during the first 5 days, but of these 20 were managed effectively with prokinetic medications; 18 required parenteral nutrition to supplement inadequately tolerated tube feeds. Intolerance did not differ between ECMO modes. Overall patients tolerated 79.7% of goal nutrition each day in the first 2 weeks.

conclusionsEnteral feeding can be well tolerated by patients who are receiving ECMO, whether in venovenous or venoarterial mode. ECMO should not exclude patients from receiving the well-documented benefits of early enteral feeding in critical illness.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationParenteral NutritionAdultAPACHECritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23949702
OpenAlexW2010333439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.