ArticleClinical neuroradiology2014
Flat panel detector computed tomography for the interaction between contrast-enhanced thrombi and stent retrievers in stroke therapy: a pilot study.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stent retrievers for acute ischemic stroke: technological advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Innovation and development of stent retrievers in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Review
- In vitro models for the experimental evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy devices in acute ischemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Review
- Imaging Clot Characteristics in Stroke and its Possible Implication on Treatment.Clinical neuroradiology · 2020Review
- High-Resolution Imaging of Interaction Between Thrombus and Stent-Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of the NeVaTM Stent Retriever: Safety and Efficacy in the Swine Thrombectomy Model.Interventional neurology · 2018Article
- Experimental evaluation of stent retrievers' mechanical properties and effectiveness.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2017Article
- Article
- Endovascular Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using the Solitaire FR Revascularization Device with Adjunctive C-Arm CT Imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to create virtual 3D views of the interaction between contrast-enhanced thrombi and three different types of stent retrievers. MATERIALS AND
methodsArtificial thrombi with and without contrast agent were created and introduced into a silicone tube with saline solution. The stent retrievers (Aperio (A), Solitaire FR (B), Revive (C)) were released around the thrombi. For each retriever, two sets (0 min, 5 min) of flat panel computed tomography (CT) data were acquired on a Siemens Axiom Artis Zee biplane angiography system and reconstructed using syngo InSpace 3D software.
resultsThe filaments of all three stent retrievers were displaced by the thrombus immediately after deployment. Another study series after 5 min showed further expansion of the stents into the thrombus. A tends to appose best around obstacles. A and B allow cushion-like bulging of clot material into the stent lumen. C showed only moderate curvilinear bulging and a minor degree of interaction in between stent filaments and thrombus.
conclusionsFlexible design allows better apposition of the device to the surface of the thrombus. A relatively strong longitudinal structure combined with large gaps in between the stent filaments seems to favor migration into the clot. The main capture mechanism seems to be engagement of the clot between the crossings of stent struts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.