ArticleParasitology research2013
Molecular identification of four phenotypes of human Demodex mites (Acari: Demodicidae) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA.
Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological survey of two morphotypes ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2024Article
- De novo transcriptome sequencing and functional annotation of Demodex canis.Experimental & applied acarology · 2022Article
- Divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA gene: DNA barcodes for molecular classification and identification of mites.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- De novo transcriptome sequencing and differential gene expression analysis of two parasitic human Demodex species.Parasitology research · 2019Article
- Cryptic diversity within grass-associated Abacarus species complex (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), with the description of a new species, Abacarus plumiger n. sp.Experimental & applied acarology · 2018Article
- DNA barcoding for molecular identification of Demodex based on mitochondrial genes.Parasitology research · 2017Article
- Prevalence of ocular demodicosis among patients at Tertiary Care Center, Bangkok, Thailand.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Cryptic speciation in the Acari: a function of species lifestyles or our ability to separate species?Experimental & applied acarology · 2015Review
- Population identification of Sarcoptes hominis and Sarcoptes canis in China using DNA sequences.Parasitology research · 2015Article
- Article
- Molecular identification and phylogenetic study of Demodex caprae.Parasitology research · 2014Article
- Phylogenetic analysis of Demodex caprae based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence.Parasitology research · 2013Article
- Molecular Characterization and Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA in Some Isolates ofIranian journal of parasitologyArticle
- Human Permanent Ectoparasites; Recent Advances on Biology and Clinical Significance ofIranian journal of parasitologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classification of Demodex mites has long depended on hosts and morphological characteristics. However, the fact that two species coexist in the same host and phenotype is easily influenced by environment causes difficulty and indeterminacy in traditional classification. Genotype, which directly reflects the molecular structure characteristics, is relatively stable. In this study, species identification of four phenotypes of human Demodex mites was conducted. Mites were morphologically classified into four phenotypes: long- and short-bodied Demodex folliculorum with finger-like terminus and Demodex brevis with finger- or cone-like terminus. The mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragment of individual mite was amplified, cloned, sequenced, and aligned. Sequence divergences, genetic distances, transition/transversion rates, and phylogenetic trees were analyzed. The results demonstrated that the 16S rDNA sequence of three phenotypes with finger-like terminus was 337 bp, and that of phenotype with cone-like terminus was 342 bp. The divergences, genetic distances, and transition/transversion rates among the three phenotypes with finger-like terminus were 0.0-2.7%, 0.000-0.029, and 5.0-7/0 (5/1-7/0), respectively, indicating an intraspecific variation. Yet, those between these three phenotypes and the one with cone-like terminus were 21.6-22.8%, 2.510-2.589, and 0.47-0.59 (22/47-27/46), respectively, suggesting an interspecific variation. The five phylogenetic trees showed that the three phenotypes with finger-like terminus clustered into one branch, while the phenotype with cone-like terminus clustered into another. In conclusion, terminus is a major morphological characteristic for the identification of human Demodex species. The three phenotypes with finger-like terminus belong to D. folliculorum, while the phenotype with cone-like terminus belongs to D. brevis. Molecular identification can verify and replenish morphological identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.