Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23949242›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Association between entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi for control of Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Caio Márcio Oliveira Monteiro, Laryssa Xavier Araújo, Renata Silva Matos, Patrícia da Silva Golo, Isabele Costa Angelo, Wendell Marcelo de Souza Perinotto, Camila Aparecida Coelho Rodrigues, John Furlong, Vânia Rita Elias Pinheiro Bittencourt, Márcia Cristina Azevedo Prata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Caio Márcio Oliveira MonteiroPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Rodovia BR 465, 23890-000, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil, caiosat@gmail.com.
Laryssa Xavier Araújo
Renata Silva Matos
Patrícia da Silva Golo
Isabele Costa Angelo
Wendell Marcelo de Souza Perinotto
Camila Aparecida Coelho Rodrigues
John Furlong
Vânia Rita Elias Pinheiro Bittencourt
Márcia Cristina Azevedo Prata
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRCentro de Ensino Superior de Juiz de Fora · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of the association of entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi on Rhipicephalus microplus. The nematodes used were Heterorhabditis bacteriophora HP88 and Heterorhabditis indica LPP1 and the fungi were Metarhizium anisopliae IBCB 116 and Beauveria bassiana ESALQ 986. In the groups treated with the fungi, the females were immersed for 3 min in a conidial suspension, while in the groups treated with the nematodes, the ticks were exposed to infective juveniles. To evaluate the interaction between entomopathogens, the females were first immersed in a conidial suspension and then exposed to the nematodes. The egg mass weight and hatching percentage values of the groups treated with M. anisopliae IBCB 116 and B. bassiana ESALQ 986 in the two experiments were statistically similar (p > 0.05) to the values of the control group. In the groups treated only with nematodes, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the egg mass weight, a fact also observed for the hatching percentage of the group treated with H. indica LPP1. In all the groups treated with nematodes in association with fungi, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the egg mass weight and hatching percentage. The percentage of control of the groups treated with fungi alone varied from 31 to 55%. In the groups treated with nematodes associated or not with fungi, the control percentage was always greater than 90% and reached 100% in the group treated with H. bacteriophora HP88 associated with the fungus M. anisopliae IBCB 116.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeauveriaFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsIxodidaeLarvaMetarhiziumNematodaPest Control, Biological

Identifiers

PMID23949242
OpenAlexW2095011314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.