ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2013
[Urticaria … and treatment fails].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the guidelines the treatment goal for all types of urticaria is to achieve complete symptom relief. Therefore the available literature for urticaria treatment was reviewed regarding this aim and treatment failure, respectively. Systematic studies are not available. Standard doses of H1-antihistamines are the only approved therapy. Review of the limited data where statements are made about complete alleviation of symptoms shows that standard doses of H1-antihistamines rarely achieve this. Even when the dosage is increased up to four-fold, the failure rate is high. Additional therapy with montelukast, dapsone, and cyclosporine A also often fails to produce complete control. For severe chronic spontaneous urticaria, controlled studies using omalizumab have shown low failure rates over long time periods. It has not been investigated whether up-dosing or reduced injection intervals could further improve this rate. Taken together, the small amount of available data on complete symptom relief in urticaria treatment is astonishing. Moreover, the studies can not be compared due to different inclusion criteria (severity of urticaria, allowed basic treatment) and evaluated parameters. Further controlled studies are vitally needed to achieve the goal of complete symptom relief in urticaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23948731What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.