ArticlePreventing chronic disease2013
Bringing bike share to a low-income community: lessons learned through community engagement, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2011.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in physical activity after joining a bikeshare program: a cohort of new bikeshare users.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Article
- Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university.PloS one · 2022Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Bikeshare Programs: A Qualitative Study in an Urban Environment.Journal of transport & health · 2021Article
- Exploring the Health and Spatial Equity Implications of the New York City Bike Share System.Journal of transport & health · 2019Article
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Bike Share Expansion to Low-Income Communities in New York City.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018Article
- Bikeshare Use in Urban Communities: Individual and Neighborhood Factors.Ethnicity & disease · 2017Article
- Health impact assessments for environmental restoration: the case of Caño Martín Peña.Annals of global healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh prevalence of physical inactivity contributes to adverse health outcomes. Active transportation (cycling or walking) is associated with better health outcomes, and bike-sharing programs can help communities increase use of active transportation. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: The Minneapolis Health Department funded the Nice Ride Minnesota bike share system to expand to the Near North community in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Near North is a diverse, low-income area of the city where residents experience health disparities, including disparities in physical activity levels.
methodsThe installation of new bike share kiosks in Near North resulted in an environmental change to support physical activity. Community engagement was conducted pre-intervention only and consisted of focus groups, community meetings, and interviews. Postintervention data on bike share trips and subscribers were collected to assess intervention effectiveness. OUTCOME: Focus group participants offered insights on facilitators and barriers to bike share and suggested system improvements. Community engagement efforts showed that Near North residents were positive about Nice Ride and wanted to use the system; however, the numbers of trips and subscriptions in Near North were low.
interpretationResults show that the first season of the expansion was moderately successful in improving outreach efforts and adapting bike share to meet the needs of low-income populations. However, environmental change without adequate, ongoing community engagement may not be sufficient to result in behavior change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.