Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23948337›Full record

Trial reportPreventing chronic disease2013

Feasibility of using a community-supported agriculture program to improve fruit and vegetable inventories and consumption in an underresourced urban community.

Sara A Quandt, Janae Dupuis, Caitlin Fish, Ralph B D'Agostino

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventing chronic disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara A QuandtDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. squandt@wakehealth.edu
Janae Dupuis
Caitlin Fish
Ralph B D'Agostino

Funding

Wake Forest Short-term Research Training ProgramT35DK007400 · NIDDK · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DONALD A. MCCLAIN · 1986 to 2026
$1.9M
Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure: The FCHL CollaborativeRC4HL104866 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARCURY, THOMAS A. · 2010 to 2010
$999k
NHLBI NIH HHS RC4 HL104866NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK007400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDirect-to-consumer marketing efforts, such as community-supported agriculture (CSA), have been proposed as a solution for disparities in fruit and vegetable consumption. Evaluations of such efforts have been limited. The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of a CSA intervention to increase household inventory of fruits and vegetables and fruit and vegetable consumption of residents of an underresourced community.

methodsFor this randomized, controlled feasibility study, we recruited 50 low-income women with children. Intervention (n=25) participants were offered 5 educational sessions and a box of fresh produce for 16 weeks; control participants were not offered the sessions nor were they included in the produce delivery. We collected data on participants' home inventory of fruits and vegetables and on their consumption of fruits and vegetables at baseline (May 2012) and postintervention (August and September 2012).

resultsOf 55 potential participants, 50 were enrolled and 44 were reached for follow-up. We observed a significant increase in the number of foods in the household inventory of fruits and vegetables in the intervention group compared with the control group. The intervention group reported greater increases in fruit and vegetable consumption; however, these did not reach significance. Intervention participants picked up produce 9.2 (standard deviation=4.58) of 16 weeks; challenges included transportation and work schedules. Most participants (20 of 21) expressed interest in continued participation; all stated a willingness to pay $10 per week, and some were willing to pay as much as $25 per week.

conclusionCSA is a feasible approach for providing fresh fruits and vegetables to an underresourced community. Future studies should evaluate the impact of such a program in a larger sample and should take additional steps to facilitate participation.

Indexed as

AdultCommunity Health ServicesCrops, AgriculturalFeasibility StudiesFemaleFood SupplyFruitHumansMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPilot ProjectsPovertyProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationVegetables

Identifiers

PMID23948337
PMCPMC3748277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.