ArticleNeurology2013
All choked up about the pseudotumor cerebri syndrome.
Article in Neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unusual presentation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.BMJ case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of pseudotumor cerebri, or idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), is most confidently established in the typical patient with evidence of papilledema, imaging that does not suggest a structural lesion, and a CSF examination that shows both normal composition and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Prompted by an increasing number of reports over the past decade, Friedman et al.(1) propose a revised set of diagnostic criteria for IIH, taking into account the most recent observations from neuroimaging studies. Although the patient with IIH is often a young woman who is above ideal body weight or obese, it is well-recognized that the disorder may also occur in obese men and in children, who are less likely to be obese than their adult counterparts. Several advances in the field prompted the expert authors to provide new guidance. First, a large study of children has redefined normal CSF opening pressure for children.(2) In the obese or sedated child, an opening pressure of 280 mm H2O has been suggested as the requirement to claim confidently that the ICP is increased. Otherwise, the diagnostic criteria for children and adults continue to rely on a CSF lumbar opening pressure of 250 mm H2O or greater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.