Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23946042›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2013

Use of natural health products in children: experiences and attitudes of family physicians in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Marshall Godwin, Farah McCrate, Leigh Anne Newhook, Andrea Pike, John Crellin, Rebecca Law, Maria Mathews, Nurun L Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Veterinarians' attitudes towards use of nutraceuticals.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2019
    Article
  2. Use of natural health products in children: qualitative analysis of parents' experiences.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marshall GodwinMemorial University of Newfoundland, Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Room 1776, Health Science Centre, 300 Prince Phillip Dr, St John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada. godwinm@mun.ca
Farah McCrate
Leigh Anne Newhook
Andrea Pike
John Crellin
Rebecca Law
Maria Mathews
Nurun L Chowdhury
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the experiences of family physicians in Newfoundland and Labrador with parents' use of natural health products (NHPs) for their children and to assess physicians' attitudes toward use of NHPs in children.

designA survey using the Dillman approach.

settingNewfoundland and Labrador.

participantsAll family physicians in the province.

main outcome measuresPhysician demographic characteristics; whether physicians inquire about the use of NHPs in children; the degree to which they think patients disclose use of NHPs in children; whether they counsel parents about the potential benefits or harms of NHPs; their own opinions about the usefulness of NHPs; whether they recommend NHPs in children and for what reasons; and the particular NHPs they have seen used in children and for what reasons.

resultsA total of 159 (33.1%) family physicians responded; 65.4% were men, 71.7% were Canadian medical graduates, and 46.5% practised in rural areas. Overall, 18.8% of family physicians said they regularly or frequently asked about NHP use; 24.7% counseled patients about potential harms. Only 1.9% of physicians believed NHPs were usually beneficial, but a similarly small number (8.4%) thought they were usually harmful. Most respondents were somewhat neutral; 59.7% said they never recommend NHPs for children, and a further 37.0% said they would only "sometimes" recommend NHPs.

conclusionMost physicians believed that NHPs were probably of little benefit but not likely to be harmful. Most NHPs used were vitamins and minerals. Physicians recognized that NHPs were often used by parents for children, but in general they believed NHPs had little effect on their day-to-day medical practices. Thirty-eight (24.7%) of the 154 physicians had at least once recommended an NHP (including vitamins) for their pediatric patients. Physicians believed that parents did not often disclose use of NHPs for their children, but at the same time physicians generally did not actively inquire.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Education as TopicPhysicians, FamilyChildComplementary TherapiesFemaleHumansMaleMateria MedicaMineralsNewfoundland and LabradorPediatricsPhytotherapyProbioticsSurveys and QuestionnairesVitaminsMateria MedicaMineralsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID23946042
PMCPMC3743712
OpenAlexW2159001334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.