Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23946032›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2013

Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Robin Z Hayeems, Fiona A Miller, June C Carroll, Julian Little, Judith Allanson, Jessica P Bytautas, Pranesh Chakraborty, Brenda J Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robin Z HayeemsDepartment of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.
Fiona A Miller
June C Carroll
Julian Little
Judith Allanson
Jessica P Bytautas
Pranesh Chakraborty
Brenda J Wilson

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 80495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the role of primary care providers in informing and supporting families who receive positive screening results.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingOntario.

participantsFamily physicians, pediatricians, and midwives involved in newborn care.

main outcome measuresBeliefs, practices, and barriers related to providing information to families who receive positive screening results for their newborns.

resultsA total of 819 providers participated (adjusted response rate of 60.9%). Of the respondents, 67.4% to 81.0% agreed that it was their responsibility to provide care to families of newborns who received positive screening results, and 64.2% to 84.8% agreed they should provide brochures or engage in general discussions about the identified conditions. Of the pediatricians, 67.3% endorsed having detailed discussions with families, but only 24.1% of family physicians and 27.6% of midwives endorsed this practice. All provider groups reported less involvement in information provision than they believed they should have. This discrepancy was most evident for family physicians: most stated that they should provide brochures (64.2%) or engage in general discussions (73.5%), but only a minority did so (15.3% and 27.7%, respectively). Family physicians reported insufficient time (42.2%), compensation (52.2%), and training (72.3%) to play this role, and only a minority agreed they were up to date (18.5%) or confident (16.5%) regarding newborn screening.

conclusionProviders of primary newborn care see an information-provision role for themselves in caring for families who receive positive newborn screening results. Efforts to further define the scope of this role combined with efforts to mitigate existing barriers are warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Education as TopicPhysicians, Primary CarePhysician's RoleCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMidwiferyNeonatal ScreeningOntarioPediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Professional Role

Identifiers

PMID23946032
PMCPMC3743702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.