ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013
EEG analysis reveals widespread directed functional interactions related to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychophysical pain encoding in the cingulate cortex predicts responsiveness of electrical stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- A novel thermoelectric device integrated with a psychophysical paradigm to study pain processing in human subjects.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Article
- Characterization of spatiotemporal dynamics of binary and graded tonic pain in humans using intracranial recordings.PloS one · 2023Article
- Vigilance to Painful Laser Stimuli is Associated with Increased State Anxiety and Tense Arousal.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Behavioral, Physiological and EEG Activities Associated with Conditioned Fear as Sensors for Fear and Anxiety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Painful cutaneous laser stimuli induce event-related oscillatory EEG activities that are different from those induced by nonpainful electrical stimuli.Journal of neurophysiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During attention to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus, event-related causality (ERC) has been detected in recordings from subdural electrodes implanted directly over cortical modules for the treatment of epilepsy. However, these studies afforded limited sampling of modules and did not examine interactions with a nonpainful stimulus as a control. We now sample scalp EEG to test the hypothesis that attention to the laser stimulus is associated with poststimulus ERC interactions that are different from those with attention to a nonpainful stimulus. Subjects attended to (counted) either a painful laser stimulus (laser attention task) or a nonpainful electrical cutaneous stimulus that produced distraction from the laser (laser distraction task). Both of these stimuli were presented in random order in a single train. The intensities of both stimuli were adjusted to produce similar baseline salience and sensations in the same cutaneous territory. The results demonstrated that EEG channels with poststimulus ERC interactions were consistently different during the laser stimulus versus the electric stimulus. Poststimulus ERC interactions for the laser attention task were different from the laser distraction task. Furthermore, scalp EEG frontal channels play a driver role while parietal temporal channels play a receiver role during both tasks, although this does not prove that these channels are connected. Sites at which large numbers of ERC interactions were found for both laser attention and distraction tasks (critical sites) were located at Cz, Pz, and C3. Stimulation leading to disruption of sites of these pain-related interactions may produce analgesia for acute pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.