Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23945683›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2013

The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Geoffrey E Hill, James D Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular parallelism in signaling function across different sexually selected ornaments in a warbler.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict.Current biology : CB · 2019
    Review
  11. Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. What can we infer about the origin of sex in early eukaryotes?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  17. Mitonuclear Ecology.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey E HillDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5414, USA. ghill@auburn.edu
James D Johnson
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why females assess ornaments when choosing mates remains a central question in evolutionary biology. We hypothesize that the imperative for a choosing female to find a mate with nuclear oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes that are compatible with her mitochondrial OXPHOS genes drives the evolution of ornaments. Indicator traits are proposed to signal the efficiency of OXPHOS function thus enabling females to select mates with nuclear genes that are compatible with maternal mitochondrial genes in the formation of OXPHOS complexes. Species-typical pattern of ornamentation is proposed to serve as a marker of mitochondrial type ensuring that females assess prospective mates with a shared mitochondrial background. The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis predicts that the production of ornaments will be closely linked to OXPHOS pathways, and that sexual selection for compatible mates will be strongest when genes for nuclear components of OXPHOS complexes are Z-linked. The implications of this hypothesis are that sexual selection may serve as a driver for the evolution of more efficient cellular respiration.

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenotypeMaleModels, GeneticOxidative PhosphorylationDNA, Mitochondrialcellular respirationgood geneslek paradoxmate choiceornamentation

Identifiers

PMID23945683
PMCPMC3757968
OpenAlexW2152900460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.