ArticleBiology direct2013
Novel autoproteolytic and DNA-damage sensing components in the bacterial SOS response and oxidized methylcytosine-induced eukaryotic DNA demethylation systems.
Article in Biology direct, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Common themes in architecture and interactions of prokaryotic PolB2 and Pol V mutasomes inferred fromComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Alternative DNA structures in hematopoiesis and adaptive immunity.Advances in immunology · 2024Review
- Novel mechanisms for the removal of strong replication-blocking HMCES- and thiazolidine-DNA adducts in humans.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- RecA-NT homology motif in ImuB is essential for mycobacterial ImuA'-ImuB protein interaction and mutasome function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Understanding the mechanisms of halotolerance in members ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Apprehending the NADViruses · 2022Article
- Effects of l-Serine on Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus suis.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Isolation and Characterization of a Newly Discovered Phage, V-YDF132, for Lysing Vibrio harveyiViruses · 2022Article
- HMCES safeguards genome integrity and long-term self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells during stress responses.Leukemia · 2022Article
- HMCES protects immunoglobulin genes specifically from deletions during somatic hypermutation.Genes & development · 2022Article
- Non-canonical LexA proteins regulate the SOS response in the Bacteroidetes.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Coexistence of SOS-Dependent and SOS-Independent Regulation of DNA Repair Genes in Radiation-ResistantCells · 2021Review
- Loss of the abasic site sensor HMCES is synthetic lethal with the activity of the APOBEC3A cytosine deaminase in cancer cells.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Characterization and Genomic Analysis of Marinobacter Phage vB_MalS-PS3, Representing a New Lambda-Like Temperate Siphoviral Genus Infecting Algae-Associated Bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Flexible comparative genomics of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Structural biology of DNA abasic site protection by SRAP proteins.DNA repair · 2020Review
- HMCES safeguards replication from oxidative stress and ensures error-free repair.EMBO reports · 2020Article
- New insights into abasic site repair and tolerance.DNA repair · 2020Review
- Coinfections of Two Strains of NDM-1- and OXA-232-Coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Kidney Transplant Patient.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The bacterial SOS response is an elaborate program for DNA repair, cell cycle regulation and adaptive mutagenesis under stress conditions. Using sensitive sequence and structure analysis, combined with contextual information derived from comparative genomics and domain architectures, we identify two novel domain superfamilies in the SOS response system. We present evidence that one of these, the SOS response associated peptidase (SRAP; Pfam: DUF159) is a novel thiol autopeptidase. Given the involvement of other autopeptidases, such as LexA and UmuD, in the SOS response, this finding suggests that multiple structurally unrelated peptidases have been recruited to this process. The second of these, the ImuB-C superfamily, is linked to the Y-family DNA polymerase-related domain in ImuB, and also occurs as a standalone protein. We present evidence using gene neighborhood analysis that both these domains function with different mutagenic polymerases in bacteria, such as Pol IV (DinB), Pol V (UmuCD) and ImuA-ImuB-DnaE2 and also other repair systems, which either deploy Ku and an ATP-dependent ligase or a SplB-like radical SAM photolyase. We suggest that the SRAP superfamily domain functions as a DNA-associated autoproteolytic switch that recruits diverse repair enzymes upon DNA damage, whereas the ImuB-C domain performs a similar function albeit in a non-catalytic fashion. We propose that C3Orf37, the eukaryotic member of the SRAP superfamily, which has been recently shown to specifically bind DNA with 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxycytosine, is a sensor for these oxidized bases generated by the TET enzymes from methylcytosine. Hence, its autoproteolytic activity might help it act as a switch that recruits DNA repair enzymes to remove these oxidized methylcytosine species as part of the DNA demethylation pathway downstream of the TET enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.