Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23944277›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2013

Perspectives on healthy eating among Appalachian residents.

Nancy E Schoenberg, Britteny M Howell, Mark Swanson, Christopher Grosh, Shoshana Bardach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Health Behaviors in Rural Appalachia.Southern medical journal · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A New Look at Barriers to Clinical Care Among Appalachian Residents Living With Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Physical Activity Barriers and Assets in Rural Appalachian Kentucky: A Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rural Grandparent Headed Households: A Qualitative Description.Online journal of rural nursing and health care : the official journal of the Rural Nurse Organization · 2018
    Article
  20. Disparities in women's cancer-related quality of life by Southern Appalachian residence.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy E SchoenbergDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. nesch@uky.edu
Britteny M Howell
Mark Swanson
Christopher Grosh
Shoshana Bardach

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
An Intergenerational CBPR Intervention to Reduce Appalachian Health DisparitiesR01DK081324 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SCHOENBERG, NANCY E. · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceTL1TR000115 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$518k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK081324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtensive attention has been focused on improving the dietary intake of Americans. Such focus is warranted due to increasing rates of overweight, obesity, and other dietary-related disease. To address suboptimal dietary intake requires an improved, contextualized understanding of the multiple and intersecting influences on healthy eating, particularly among those populations at greatest risk of and from poor diet, including rural residents.

methodsDuring 8 focus groups (N = 99) and 6 group key informant interviews (N = 20), diverse Appalachian rural residents were queried about their perceptions of healthy eating, determinants of healthy food intake, and recommendations for improving the dietary intake of people in their communities. Participants included church members and other laypeople, public health officials, social service providers, health care professionals, and others.

findingsParticipants offered insights on healthy eating consistent with the categories of individual, interpersonal, community, physical, environmental, and society-level influences described in the socioecological model. Although many participants identified gaps in dietary knowledge as a persistent problem, informants also identified extraindividual factors, including the influence of family, fellow church members, and schools, policy, advertising and media, and general societal trends, as challenges to healthy dietary intake. We highlight Appalachian residents' recommendations for promoting healthier diets, including support groups, educational workshops, cooking classes, and community gardening.

conclusionsWe discuss the implications of these findings for programmatic development in the Appalachian context.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Status DisparitiesHumansKentuckyMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adultdietary intakehealth disparitiesqualitative researchrural

Identifiers

PMID23944277
PMCPMC3752844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.