Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23943846›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2013

Reactions to framing of cessation messages: insights from dual-smoker couples.

Isaac M Lipkus, Krista W Ranby, Megan A Lewis, Benjamin Toll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictors of Successful Quitting among Thai Adult Smokers: Evidence from ITC-SEA (Thailand) Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isaac M LipkusDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC;
Krista W Ranby
Megan A Lewis
Benjamin Toll
Duke University · USRTI International · USSmilow Cancer Hospital · USUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

TRANSLATION AND DISSEMINATION COREP30DA023026 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HOYLE, RICK · 2008 to 2023
$19.6M
Effects of Message Framing on Cessation among Couples where both Partners SmokeR21CA165194 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LIPKUS, ISAAC M · 2012 to 2013
$422k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA165194NCI NIH HHS R21-CA165194NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA023026NIDA NIH HHS P30-DA023026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCouples in which both members smoke (dual-smoker couples) have not been the explicit target of cessation interventions. Quit rates are lower and relapse rates are higher among individuals in dual-smoker couples. A potentially effective strategy to motivate dual-smoker couples to quit is to convey messages that highlight how the positive outcomes of quitting (gain frame) or the negative outcomes of continued smoking (loss frame) affect the couple rather than the individual smoker. We explored whether dual-smoker couples' smoking behaviors (e.g., amount smoked) and desire to quit would differ as a function of message frame (gain vs. loss) or outcome focus (individual vs. couple).

methodsDual-smoker couples (N = 40) completed a baseline survey and were then randomized to review gain- or loss-framed messages that varied whether the outcomes influenced the individual or the couple. Main outcomes were desire to quit after reading messages and smoking behaviors at a 1-month follow-up.

resultsCouple-focused messages produced the strongest desire to quit and decreased amount of cigarettes smoked at follow-up. The latter effect was mediated by desire to quit. Loss-framed messages produced inconsistent effects on desire to quit. There were no significant interactions between outcome focus and message framing.

conclusionsFindings suggest that messages emphasizing how smoking affects both partners can motivate cessation among dual-smoker couples. Contrary to findings showing that gain-framed messages motivate cessation targeting individual smokers, results suggest that loss-framed messages may be more persuasive than gain-framed messages when the target of the outcome involves significant others.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdultAffectAgedAttitude to HealthDemographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNorth CarolinaPersuasive CommunicationSexual PartnersSmoking

Identifiers

PMID23943846
PMCPMC3819974
OpenAlexW2028264646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.