ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research2013
Intravitreal Bevacizumab with or without Triamcinolone for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema: Long-term Results of a Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor combined with intravitreal steroids for diabetic macular oedema.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Current Treatments in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with 1 mg triamcinolone in diabetic macular edema: a randomized clinical trial.International ophthalmology · 2018Trial
- Mechanistic Insights into the Combined Anti-inflammatory Effects of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone in Hyperglycemic Retinal Cells: Modulation of MCP-1, CXCL10, and Their Receptors.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026Article
- Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combined with Ocular Steroid Therapy for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab with macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systemic review and Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Intravitreal fasudil combined with bevacizumab for treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema; a pilot study.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2013Article
- Macular edema: drying is not repairing.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2013Article
- Intravitreal Injection of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Ocular Vascular Diseases: Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
- Outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema in a tertiary care eye hospital, Karachi.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the long-term results of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection alone or combined, at the time of first IVB injection, with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) for treatment of refractory diabetic macular edema (DME).
methodsIn this randomized clinical trial, 115 eyes of 101 patients with refractory DME were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: the IVB group (41 eyes) received three consecutive injections of 1.25 mg IVB at 6-week intervals; the IVB/IVT group (37 eyes) additionally received 2 mg of IVT at the time of first IVB injection; and the control (sham injection) group. Patients in the IVB and IVB/IVT groups were followed for a mean of 13.3 months and received retreatment with IVB alone whenever indicated. Main outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT).
resultsAt the last follow up, CMT decreased significantly in the IVB group (p=0.013) but it was not significant (p=0.13) in the IVB/IVT group. Mean CMT improvement was 91 (95% CI, 20 to 161) microns and 57 (95% CI, -18 to 133) microns in the IVB and IVB/IVT groups, respectively. Mean BCVA improvement from baseline was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.38) logMAR (P=0.017) in the IVB group and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.30) logMAR (P=0.001) in the IVB/IVT group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of visual improvment (p=0.42). In generalized linear mixed model, only the time interval between the last injection and CMT measurement was statistically significant (P=0.04). The same results were repeated for visual acuity (P=0.03).
conclusionThree loading doses of IVB (added doses if required) have long-term beneficial effects for treatment of refractory DME. Adding triamcinolone to this regimen provides no additional long-term benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23943683PMC3740475W1684642266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.