Sugar-modified foldamers as conformationally defined and biologically distinct glycopeptide mimics.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Synthesis and conformational analysis of linear homo- and heterooligomers from novel 2-C-branched sugar amino acids (SAAs).Scientific reports · 2018
   Article
2. Tailored chondroitin sulfate glycomimeticsChemical science · 2015
   Article
3. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2014
   Review
4. Molecular architecture with carbohydrate functionalized β-peptides adopting 314-helical conformation.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as