Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23943539›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2014

The January effect: medication reinitiation among Medicare Part D beneficiaries.

Cameron Kaplan, Yuting Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?Health care management science · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Descriptive Study of HIV Patients Highly Adherent to Antiretroviral.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Erectile Dysfunction Medication Use in Veterans Eligible for Medicare Part D.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cameron KaplanUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yuting Zhang

Funding

Comparing Methods to Pay for Psychotropic Medications for Medicare BeneficiariesRC1MH088510 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZHANG, YUTING · 2009 to 2010
$912k
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Response to the Medicare Coverage Gap among PatiR01HS018657 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZHANG, YUTING · 2010 to 2012
$676k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018657NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Medicare prescription drug program (Part D) standard benefit includes deductible, initial coverage, coverage gap and catastrophic coverage phases. As beneficiaries enter each phase, their out-of-pocket medication costs change discontinuously. The benefit cycle restarts on 1 January of the next year. Taking advantage of variation in drug coverage, we study how individuals reinitiate discontinued medications in response to the non-linear price schedule. Because some beneficiaries who receive low-income subsidies (LIS) have zero or fixed small copayments throughout the year, we perform a difference-in-difference analysis by using the LIS group as a comparison. We find that individuals delay reinitiating important medications in December and are significantly more likely to reinitiate in January than in other months. Although we find some evidence that reinitiation is lower in the final months of the year, it is mostly driven by those who face higher prices due to the coverage gap. Our study suggests that individuals respond more to the current price of medications and do not anticipate future prices as well as theory would suggest.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalMedicare Part DAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMiddle AgedPovertyPrescription DrugsPrescription FeesUnited StatesPrescription Drugsinsurance benefit designmedicarenon-linear pricingpharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID23943539
PMCPMC3841288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.