Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23943330›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2013

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry methods for measuring dipeptide abundance in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Manhong Wu, Yue Xu, William L Fitch, Ming Zheng, Robert E Merritt, Joseph B Shrager, Weiruo Zhang, David L Dill, Gary Peltz, Chuong D Hoang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. One extraction tool forJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manhong Wu *Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Yue Xu *Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
William L FitchDepartment of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Ming ZhengDepartment of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Robert E MerrittDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Joseph B ShragerDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Weiruo ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University School of Engineering.
David L DillDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University School of Engineering.
Gary PeltzDepartment of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Chuong D HoangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Stanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Human Pharmacogenetics and Human Liver RegenerationR01DK090992 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PELTZ, GARY A · 2010 to 2014
$6.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK090992NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK090992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMetabolomic profiling is a promising methodology of identifying candidate biomarkers for disease detection and monitoring. Although lung cancer is among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, the lung tumor metabolome has not been fully characterized.

methodsWe utilized a targeted metabolomic approach to analyze discrete groups of related metabolites. We adopted a dansyl [5-(dimethylamino)-1-naphthalene sulfonamide] derivatization with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to analyze changes of metabolites from paired tumor and normal lung tissues. Identification of dansylated dipeptides was confirmed with synthetic standards. A systematic analysis of retention times was required to reliably identify isobaric dipeptides. We validated our findings in a separate sample cohort.

resultsWe produced a database of the LC retention times and MS/MS spectra of 361 dansyl dipeptides. Interpretation of the spectra is presented. Using this standard data, we identified a total of 279 dipeptides in lung tumor tissue. The abundance of 90 dipeptides was selectively increased in lung tumor tissue compared to normal tissue. In a second set of validation tissues, 12 dipeptides were selectively increased.

conclusionsA systematic evaluation of certain metabolite classes in lung tumors may identify promising disease-specific metabolites. Our database of all possible dipeptides will facilitate ongoing translational applications of metabolomic profiling as it relates to lung cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCohort StudiesDipeptidesHumansLung NeoplasmsMetabolomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersDipeptides

Identifiers

PMID23943330
PMCPMC3755500
OpenAlexW1892082417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.