Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23943073›Full record

ArticleInfection2013

Risk factors for false-negative results of T-SPOT.TB and tuberculin skin test in extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Y-M Lee, K-H Park, S-M Kim, S J Park, S-O Lee, S-H Choi, Y S Kim, J H Woo, S-H Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Tuberculosis of Rib: Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Hepatic and Intra-abdominal Tuberculosis: 2016 Update.Current infectious disease reports · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Ocular Tuberculosis--A Clinical Conundrum.Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2016
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Is the sensitivity of the QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube test lower than that of T-SPOT.TB in patients with miliary tuberculosis?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Y-M LeeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Republic of Korea.
K-H Park
S-M Kim
S J Park
S-O Lee
S-H Choi
Y S Kim
J H Woo
S-H Kim
Ulsan College · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KRAsan Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeT-SPOT.TB, a recently developed T cell-based assay, has shown promise in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). However, a limited number of reports have compared the risk factors for false-negative results of tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) and T-SPOT.TB assays in patients with EPTB. We, thus, conducted a prospective, blinded, observational study to evaluate the risk factors for false-negative T-SPOT.TB and TST results in patients with EPTB.

methodsBetween April 2008 and November 2011, all adult patients with suspected EPTB were prospectively enrolled at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (an intermediate TB-burden country). Only patients with confirmed and probable EPTB who underwent TST and T-SPOT.TB were included in the final analysis.

resultsOf the 324 patients who underwent both TST and T-SPOT.TB testing, 128 patients with 96 (75 %) culture- or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed and 32 (25 %) probable EPTB were finally analyzed. T-SPOT.TB assays were less likely to yield false-negative results than TSTs [17 % (22/128) vs. 54 % (69/128), p < 0.001]. In a multivariate analysis, miliary TB was associated with false-negative TSTs [odds ratio (OR) = 5.3; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.7-16.1], while immunosuppression showed a trend toward false-negative TSTs (OR = 2.5; 95 % CI 0.9-6.8). Conversely, lymph node TB (OR = 0.2; 95 % CI 0.1-0.5) and skeletal TB (OR = 0.2; 95 % CI 0.1-0.5) were associated with true-positive TST results. The only risk factor for false-negative T-SPOT.TB results was TB meningitis (OR = 2.6; 95 % CI 1.0-6.6).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that T-SPOT.TB has a better sensitivity to diagnose EPTB than TST, especially in patients with immunosuppression or miliary TB.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansInterferon-gamma Release TestsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaTuberculin TestTuberculosisTuberculosis, Miliary

Identifiers

PMID23943073
OpenAlexW2018503012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.