Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23943015›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2014

Late presentation and loss to follow-up of immigrants newly diagnosed with HIV in the HAART era.

A Saracino, A Tartaglia, G Trillo, C Muschitiello, C Bellacosa, G Brindicci, L Monno, G Angarano

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A SaracinoClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Foggia, Viale L. Pinto 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy, annalisa.saracino@gmail.com.
A Tartaglia
G Trillo
C Muschitiello
C Bellacosa
G Brindicci
L Monno
G Angarano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of newly HIV-diagnosed immigrants to natives. Patients with a first HIV diagnosis from 1996 to 2010 were included. Of 716 new diagnoses, 85 (12 %) were immigrants. Migrants were younger, more frequently females and sexually infected, less likely to voluntarily request testing, and less HCV-coinfected. Late presenters (CD4 <350 or AIDS) were 76 % among migrants versus 56 % in natives (p = 0.006) with an increasing trend over time. HAART was initiated in 76.5 % of natives and 72.4 % of immigrants; the number/type of adverse events and treatment discontinuation were similar. Immigrants received more NNRTIs-based regimens. A similar proportion of patients reached virological suppression at month 1-3-6 after HAART initiation, but 43 % of immigrants versus 27 % of natives resulted lost to follow-up (p < 0.001). Diagnosis of HIV was often delayed among migrants, who also presented a higher rate of lost to follow-up.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveEmigrants and ImmigrantsAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansItalyLost to Follow-UpMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.