Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942987›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013

Evaluation of a pilot study to influence medication adherence of patients with diabetes mellitus type-2 by the pharmacy.

Prem Adhien, Liset van Dijk, Marinke de Vegter, Marnix Westein, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacy Technicians and Improving Onychomycosis Treatment Outcomes.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Community Pharmacy-Based Adherence Programs and the Role of Pharmacy Technicians: A Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Prem AdhienDepartment of General Practice, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Liset van Dijk
Marinke de Vegter
Marnix Westein
Giel Nijpels
Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLRoyal Dutch Pharmacists Association · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions aimed to increase adherence to drug treatment usually are not tailored to the needs of individual patients. A modular pharmacy intervention, named 'Support for Diabetes', was developed to improve adherence to type 2 diabetes treatment.

objectiveTo evaluate the implementation of a new care intervention by using focus groups including pharmacy teams, and assess patient satisfaction.

settingCommunity pharmacies in The Netherlands.

methodThe intervention comprises a structured patient interview, an intervention guide and modular interventions tailored to the underlying cause of non-adherence. Feasibility was studied in non-adherent type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, and evaluated by means of focus group interviews with pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. Topics included practicability of the patient selection procedure, patient interviews, materials developed for the intervention and general practitioner (GP) co-operation. Patients' experiences (n = 36) were assessed by means of a questionnaire.

main outcome measureFeasibility of the intervention and patients' satisfaction.

resultsPharmacists and pharmacy technicians considered the intervention feasible and appreciated its pro-active approach. Involvement of pharmacy technicians proved a stimulating factor. Poor co-operation with GPs and lack of time as well as financial compensation were interfering factors. Patients appreciated the intervention and reported to follow the advice of pharmacists.

conclusionThe 'Support for Diabetes' intervention is feasible to implement in pharmacy practice. Poor co-operation between pharmacists and GPs and lack of re-imbursement are obstructions for implementation on a wider scale. These issues should receive attention of pharmacists, policymakers and researchers.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesCooperative BehaviorDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Focus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesGeneral PractitionersHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMedication AdherenceNetherlandsPatient SatisfactionPatient SelectionPharmacistsPharmacy TechniciansPilot ProjectsProfessional RoleHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID23942987
OpenAlexW2136862745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.