Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2013
Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: the importance of planning by the surgeon.
Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018Pooled it
- 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.Biomedical engineering online · 2016Pooled it
- Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2015Pooled it
- Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Pooled it
- Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014Trial
- No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014Trial
- Enhancing Surgical Efficiency and Radiological Outcomes Through Advances in Patient-Specific Instrument Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Combined Edge Loss UNet for Optimized Segmentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Preoperative Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical outcomes after using patient specific instrumentation: is it worth the effort? A minimum 5-year retrospective review of 298 PSI knees.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Surgeon Dominated Design Can Improve the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instruments in Kinematically Aligned TKA.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Based Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Algorithm for Total Knee Arthroplasty.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
- Femoral Valgus Correction Angle for the Intramedullary Alignment Rod Is Strongly Associated with Femoral Lateral Bowing in Japanese Patients with Varus Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.Advances in orthopedics · 2022Article
- High intra- and inter-observer reliability of planning implant size in MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Statistical Modeling of Lower Limb Kinetics During Deep Squat and Forward Lunge.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019Article
- Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018Article
- Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
- The intercondylar notch ceiling: an accurate reference for distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty for severely degenerated varus knees.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the planning of the patient-specific pin guides in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This planning was performed primarily by a technician of the company and offered to the surgeon. All parameters of the implantation can either be modified or accepted by the surgeon. The hypothesis was that the plan needs preoperative intervention by the surgeon.
methodsA prospective study in 50 patients was carried out. All patients received the same posterior-stabilised implant with patient-specific instrumentation. All surgical parameters (coronal, sagittal, rotational alignment, femoral and tibial resection levels and implant sizes) were checked by the orthopaedic surgeon and changed if necessary.
resultsPreoperatively, the femoral size was changed in 8 patients (16 %), the femoral flexion in 23 patients (46 %), the femoral shift in 34 patients (68 %), the tibial size in 24 patients (48 %) and the tibial rotation in all patients. The epicondylar axis was accepted in 47 patients (94 %) in the technician plan. Mean planning time was 8 ± 4 min. Intraoperatively, the femoral anterior-posterior size was in 50 patients (100 %) the same as in the surgeon and in 42 patients (84 %) the same as in the technician plan (p = 0.003). The tibial component implanted was in 42 patients (84 %) the same as in the surgeon and in 19 patients (38 %) the same as in the technician plan (p < 0.0001). A femoral distal recut was necessary in 31 patients (62 %) and a change of the tibial proximal cut in 17 patients (34 %) during surgery. Intraoperatively, no changes of the femoral and tibial alignment, the femoral anterior-posterior size, the femoral flexion, the femoral shift, the femoral and tibial rotation were necessary. Postoperatively, the coronal mechanical overall axis was within ±3° in 47 patients (94 %) with a maximum deviation of 5.6°.
conclusionsSignificant changes of the technician plan were necessary to get an accurate preoperative plan. Intraoperative changes were significant less compared to the surgeon than to the technician plan. No major changes (alignment, femoral anterior-posterior size and rotation) of the surgeon plan were necessary. Surgeons using patient-specific pin guides in TKA may verify the default plan provided by the technician. A blind reply on the technician plan may be not recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23942881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.