Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942596›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Does it matter what you call it? A randomized trial of language used to describe palliative care services.

R M Maciasz, R M Arnold, E Chu, S Y Park, D B White, L B Vater, Y Schenker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02712229 (A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Primary Palliative Care Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02712229 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Primary Palliative Care Intervention (CONNECT) for Patients With Advanced Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,290ConditionsAdvanced CancerArmsCONNECT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Perceptions of palliative care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How early should be "Early Integrated Palliative Care"?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. How, when, and why individuals with stage IV cancer seen in an outpatient setting are referred to palliative care: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R M MaciaszDoris Duke Clinical Research Fellow, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R M Arnold
E Chu
S Y Park
D B White
L B Vater
Y Schenker

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2RR024154 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$22.2M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000146NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegration of palliative care into oncology practice remains suboptimal. Misperceptions about the meaning of palliative care may negatively impact utilization. PURPOSE: We assessed whether the term and/or description of palliative care services affected patient views.

methods2x2 between-subject randomized factorial telephone survey of 169 patients with advanced cancer. Patients were randomized into one of four groups that differed by name (supportive care vs. palliative care) and description (patient-centered vs. traditional). Main outcomes (0-10 Likert scale) were patient understanding, impressions, perceived need, and intended use of services.

resultsWhen compared to palliative care, the term supportive care was associated with better understanding (7.7 vs. 6.8; p = 0.021), more favorable impressions (8.4 vs. 7.3; p = 0.002), and higher future perceived need (8.6 vs. 7.7; p = 0.017). There was no difference in outcomes between traditional and patient-centered descriptions. In adjusted linear regression models, the term supportive care remained associated with more favorable impressions (p = 0.003) and higher future perceived need (p = 0.022) when compared to palliative care.

conclusionsPatients with advanced cancer view the name supportive care more favorably than palliative care. Future efforts to integrate principles of palliative medicine into oncology may require changing impressions of palliative care or substituting the term supportive care.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID23942596
PMCPMC3823760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.