ArticleJournal of oncology practice2013
Evolution of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative supportive care quality measures portfolio and conformance at a Veterans Affairs medical center.
Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs Health Care System In-Person and National TeleOncology Service-Delivered Care.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Review
- Improving Care With a Portfolio of Physician-Led Cancer Quality Measures at an Academic Center.Journal of oncology practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA growing set of quality measures is being implemented to evaluate all components of cancer care, from diagnosis through the end of life. We investigated the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) quality measures portfolio. Additionally, we explored the effect of quality measure type on conformance.
methodsWe performed QOPI data collections twice per year from fall 2007 through fall 2010 and spring 2012, using chart review of the Durham Veterans Administration outpatient oncology clinic. We categorized QOPI measures as nontreatment-related supportive care (NTSC), treatment-related supportive care (TSC), diagnostic, or therapeutic. Descriptive statistics and χ(2) were used to compare longitudinal conformance.
resultsThe majority of QOPI measures in spring 2012 assess processes of chemotherapy treatment (therapeutic, 54.3%; TSC, 8.7%) or diagnostic modalities (19.6%). Measures targeting NTSC are few (17.4%) but increased from three measures in fall 2007 to eight measures in spring 2012. During those 5 years, average conformance to NTSC, TSC, diagnostic, and therapeutic measures was 71.4%, 86.1%, 89.3%, and 75.4%, respectively (P < .001). Within the NTSC measures, emotional well-being and constipation assessment were least documented (41.0% and 46.3%, respectively). In spring 2012, NTSC measure conformance (75.8%) remained significantly lower than diagnostic measure conformance (91.5%; P < .001).
conclusionMost QOPI quality measures assess diagnosis or treatment processes of care and not supportive care. Aggregate conformance to the NTSC measures was lower than that of other categories. The differential conformance demonstrates the necessity of standardized documentation methods and quality improvement efforts that remain commensurate with the increasing portfolio of supportive care measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.