Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942470›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2013

The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders.

Scott J Russo, Eric J Nestler

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 992 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
992citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

992 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Multilevel sex-influenced neurobiological signatures of early life adversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

932 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott J RussoFishberg Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA. scott.russo@mssm. edu
Eric J Nestler

Funding

REPRESSIVE HISTONE AND DNA METHYLATION IN RODENT DEPRESSION MODELSP50MH096890 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2012 to 2021
$20.2M
Using neuroeconomics to disentangle the transcriptional mechanisms underlying resilience versus susceptibility to stressR01MH051399 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, ERIC J. · 1994 to 2023
$10.2M
Role of thalamic versus cortical inputs to nucleus accumbens in stress-related disordersR01MH090264 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI RUSSO, SCOTT JAMES · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH096890NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH96890NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090264NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH51399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mood disorders are common and debilitating conditions characterized in part by profound deficits in reward-related behavioural domains. A recent literature has identified important structural and functional alterations within the brain's reward circuitry--particularly in the ventral tegmental area-nucleus accumbens pathway--that are associated with symptoms such as anhedonia and aberrant reward-associated perception and memory. This Review synthesizes recent data from human and rodent studies from which emerges a circuit-level framework for understanding reward deficits in depression. We also discuss some of the molecular and cellular underpinnings of this framework, ranging from adaptations in glutamatergic synapses and neurotrophic factors to transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBrainHumansMood DisordersNeural Pathways

Identifiers

PMID23942470
PMCPMC3867253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.