Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942451›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2013

Protein adaptation: mitotic functions for membrane trafficking proteins.

Stephen J Royle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mitotic spindle membranes.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A SNARE protein Syntaxin 17 captures CFTR to potentiate autophagosomal clearance under stress.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen J RoyleDivision of Biomedical Cell Biology, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. s.j.royle@warwick.ac.uk

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H015582/1Cancer Research UK 15182Cancer Research UK C25425/A15182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane trafficking and mitosis are two essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Surprisingly, many proteins best known for their role in membrane trafficking have additional 'moonlighting' functions in mitosis. Despite having proteins in common, there is insufficient evidence for a specific connection between these two processes. Instead, these phenomena demonstrate the adaptability of the membrane trafficking machinery that allows its repurposing for different cellular functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsCell MembraneCentrosomeClathrinEndocytosisHumansIntracellular MembranesKinetochoresMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMitosisModels, BiologicalM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsProtein BindingCell Cycle ProteinsClathrinMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsTACC3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23942451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.