ArticleExperimental brain research1990
Horizontal optokinetic responses under stroboscopic illumination in cat, monkey and man.
Article in Experimental brain research, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contribution of visual velocity and displacement cues to human balancing of support surface tilt.Experimental brain research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The horizontal optokinetic reflex (OKN) was studied in cat, monkey and man under conditions of steady or stroboscopic illumination. In all species, there was an abrupt decrease in OKN gain for a given spatial displacement of the stimulus between two consecutive stroboscopic flashes. The upper limit of spatial displacement which preserved optimal OKN gain was independent of stimulus velocity and flash frequency. The value of this limit differed in the three species studied. In the cat, OKN gain was affected when the spatial displacement between two stimuli exceeded 0.55 degrees of visual angle. In monkey and man, these limits were 1.48 degrees and 2.87 degrees, respectively. When human subjects were asked to volontary track the stimulus, the limit value reached 4.3 degrees. This result is discussed in the context of the evolution of the smooth pursuit system and its contribution to optokinetic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.