Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942218›Full record

ArticleMedical care2013

Identifying patients at increased risk for unplanned readmission.

Elizabeth H Bradley, Olga Yakusheva, Leora I Horwitz, Heather Sipsma, Jason Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementing an Individual-Centric Discharge Process across Singapore Public Hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Derivation and Evaluation of a Risk-Scoring Tool to Predict Participant Attrition in a Lifestyle Intervention Project.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth H BradleyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. elizabeth.bradley@yale.edu
Olga Yakusheva
Leora I Horwitz
Heather Sipsma
Jason Fletcher

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Yale Training Program in Health Services ResearchT32HS017589 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLESINGER, MARK J · 2008 to 2024
$5.6M
Heart Failure Readmissions in Older Adults: A Systems PerspectiveK08AG038336 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HORWITZ, LEORA · 2010 to 2013
$648k
AHRQ HHS 5 T32 HS 017589AHRQ HHS T32 HS017589NIA NIH HHS K08 AG038336NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing readmissions is a national priority, but many hospitals lack practical tools to identify patients at increased risk of unplanned readmission.

objectiveTo estimate the association between a composite measure of patient condition at discharge, the Rothman Index (RI), and unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. SUBJECTS: Adult medical and surgical patients in a major teaching hospital in 2011. MEASURES: The RI is a composite measure updated regularly from the electronic medical record based on changes in vital signs, nursing assessments, Braden score, cardiac rhythms, and laboratory test results. We developed 4 categories of RI and tested its association with readmission within 30 days, using logistic regression, adjusted for patient age, sex, insurance status, service assignment (medical or surgical), and primary discharge diagnosis.

resultsSixteen percent of the sample patients (N=2730) had an unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. The risk of readmission for a patient in the highest risk category (RI<70) was >1 in 5 while the risk of readmission for patients in the lowest risk category was about 1 in 10. In multivariable analysis, patients with an RI<70 (the highest risk category) or 70-79 (medium risk category) had 2.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.72-4.07) and 2.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.67) times higher odds of unplanned readmission, respectively, compared with patients in the lowest risk category.

conclusionClinicians can use the RI to help target hospital programs and supports to patients at highest risk of readmission.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth StatusHumansInsurance CoverageLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRisk AssessmentSex

Identifiers

PMID23942218
PMCPMC3771868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.