Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942203›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014

Streamlined ion torrent PGM-based diagnostics: BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes as a model.

Julien Tarabeux, Bruno Zeitouni, Virginie Moncoutier, Henrique Tenreiro, Khadija Abidallah, Séverine Lair, Patricia Legoix-Né, Quentin Leroy, Etienne Rouleau, Lisa Golmard and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mosaicism and prenatal diagnosis options: insights from retinoblastoma.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New challenges for BRCA testing: a view from the diagnostic laboratory.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julien Tarabeux1] Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France [2] INSERM U830, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Bruno ZeitouniINSERM U900, Mines Paris Tech, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Virginie MoncoutierService de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Henrique TenreiroService de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Khadija AbidallahService de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Séverine LairINSERM U900, Mines Paris Tech, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Patricia Legoix-NéNext Generation Sequencing Platform, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Quentin LeroyNext Generation Sequencing Platform, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Etienne RouleauService de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Lisa Golmard1] Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France [2] INSERM U830, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Emmanuel BarillotINSERM U900, Mines Paris Tech, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marc-Henri Stern1] Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France [2] INSERM U830, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Thomas Rio-FrioNext Generation Sequencing Platform, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet1] Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France [2] INSERM U830, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France [3] Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Claude Houdayer1] Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, Paris, France [2] INSERM U830, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Curie, Paris, France [3] Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Institut Curie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To meet challenges in terms of throughput and turnaround time, many diagnostic laboratories are shifting from Sanger sequencing to higher throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. Bearing in mind that the performance and quality criteria expected from NGS in diagnostic or research settings are strikingly different, we have developed an Ion Torrent's PGM-based routine diagnostic procedure for BRCA1/2 sequencing. The procedure was first tested on a training set of 62 control samples, and then blindly validated on 77 samples in parallel with our routine technique. The training set was composed of difficult cases, for example, insertions and/or deletions of various sizes, large-scale rearrangements and, obviously, mutations occurring in homopolymer regions. We also compared two bioinformatic solutions in this diagnostic context, an in-house academic pipeline and the commercially available NextGene software (Softgenetics). NextGene analysis provided higher sensitivity, as four previously undetected single-nucleotide variations were found. Regarding specificity, an average of 1.5 confirmatory Sanger sequencings per patient was needed for complete BRCA1/2 screening. Large-scale rearrangements were identified by two distinct analyses, that is, bioinformatics and fragment analysis with electrophoresis profile comparison. Turnaround time was enhanced, as a series of 30 patients were sequenced by one technician, making the results available for the clinician in 10 working days following blood sampling. BRCA1/2 genes are a good model, representative of the difficulties commonly encountered in diagnostic settings, which is why we believe our findings are of interest for the whole community, and the pipeline described can be adapted by any user of PGM for diagnostic purposes.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGene RearrangementGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOvarian NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionSoftwareBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23942203
PMCPMC3953907
OpenAlexW2037170370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.