Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23942079›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

Mutational analysis of Polycomb genes in solid tumours identifies PHC3 amplification as a possible cancer-driving genetic alteration.

F Crea, L Sun, L Pikor, P Frumento, W L Lam, C D Helgason

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prion-like Properties of Short Isoforms of Human Chromatin Modifier PHC3.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Hypermethylation ofEXCLI journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetics of lung cancer.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Neonatal tumours.Pediatric surgery international · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

F CreaExperimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 W 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1L3.
L Sun
L Pikor
P Frumento
W L Lam
C D Helgason
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycomb group genes (PcGs) are epigenetic effectors implicated in most cancer hallmarks. The mutational status of all PcGs has never been systematically assessed in solid tumours.

methodsWe conducted a multi-step analysis on publically available databases and patient samples to identify somatic aberrations of PcGs.

resultsData from more than 1000 cancer patients show for the first time that the PcG member PHC3 is amplified in three epithelial neoplasms (rate: 8-35%). This aberration predicts poorer prognosis in lung and uterine carcinomas (P<0.01). Gene amplification correlates with mRNA overexpression (P<0.01), suggesting a functional role of this aberration.

conclusionPHC3 amplification may emerge as a biomarker and potential therapeutic target in a relevant fraction of epithelial tumours.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisEndometrial NeoplasmsEpigenomicsFemaleGene AmplificationHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMutationNeoplasmsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1PrognosisRNA, MessengerPHC3 protein, humanPolycomb Repressive Complex 1RNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23942079
PMCPMC3776977
OpenAlexW2127958425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.