ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013
HER2-overexpressing breast cancer: FDG uptake after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts the outcome of neoadjuvant treatment.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted 18f-fdg pet/ct for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The accuracy ofEuropean radiology · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinicopathological and molecular predictors of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Trial
- Article
- Prognostic Impact of Early Metabolic Response on Interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of baseline FDG PET/CT in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with first-line trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- A compositeBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- A review of the association between baseline [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and axillary pathological complete response in node-positive breast cancer patients: focus on clinical subtypes.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Review
- The EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in breast cancer: Important milestones and perspectives for the future.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Review
- Molecular imaging of HER2 expression in breast cancer patients using a novel peptide-based tracerJournal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Novel applications of molecular imaging to guide breast cancer therapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Review
- Update on Quantitative Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Response in Oncology.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2020Review
- Subtype-GuidedThe oncologist · 2020Article
- Article
- Additional value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2017Article
- Article
- Biomarkers of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is associated with improved survival of patients with HER2+ breast cancer. We investigated the ability of interim positron emission tomography (PET) regarding early prediction of pathology outcomes.
methodsDuring 61 months, consecutive patients with locally advanced or large HER2+ breast cancer patients without distant metastases were included. All patients received NAT with four cycles of epirubicin+cyclophosphamide, followed by four cycles of docetaxel+trastuzumab. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) was performed at baseline (PET₁) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET₂). Maximum standardised uptake values were measured in the primary tumour as well as in the axillary lymph nodes. The correlation between pathologic response and SUV parameters (SUVmax at PET₁, PET₂ and ΔSUVmax) was examined with the t-test. The predictive performance regarding the identification of non-responders was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.
resultsThirty women were prospectively included and 60 PET/CT examination performed. At baseline, 22 patients had PET+ axilla and in nine of them ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was higher than in the primary tumour. At surgery, 14 patients (47%) showed residual tumour (non-pCR), whereas 16 (53%) reached pCR. Best prediction was obtained when considering the absolute residual SUVmax value at PET₂ (AUC=0.91) vs 0.67 for SUVmax at PET₁ and 0.86 for ΔSUVmax. The risk of non-pCR was 92.3% in patients with any site of residual uptake >3 at PET₂, no matter whether in breast or axilla, vs 11.8% in patients with uptake ≤3 (P=0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall accuracy of this cutoff were, respectively: 85.7%, 93.8%, 92.3%, 88.2% and 90%.
conclusionThe level of residual ¹⁸F-FDG uptake after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts residual disease at completion of NAT with chemotherapy+trastuzumab with high accuracy. Because many innovative therapeutic strategies are now available (e.g., addition of a second HER2-directed therapy or an antiangiogenic), early prediction of poor response is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.