ArticleForensic science international. Genetics2013
Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains.
Article in Forensic science international. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Handheld hyperspectral imaging as a tool for the post-mortem interval estimation of human skeletal remains.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Eye and hair color prediction of an early medieval adult and subadult skeleton using massive parallel sequencing technology.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- NuMY-A qPCR Assay Simultaneously Targeting Human Autosomal, Y-Chromosomal, and Mitochondrial DNA.Genes · 2023Article
- Article
- Application of natural sciences methodology in archaeological study of Iron Age burials in Latvia: pilot study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2023Article
- Exploring STR sequencing for forensic DNA intelligence databasing using the Austrian National DNA Database as an example.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Genetic and phylogeographic evidence for Jewish Holocaust victims at the Sobibór death camp.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Evidence for multi-copy Mega-NUMTs in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- Tooth Enamel and its Dynamic Protein Matrix.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance, concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessing various Infrared (IR) microscopic imaging techniques for post-mortem interval evaluation of human skeletal remains.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Archaeological excavations conducted at an early mediaeval cemetery in Volders (Tyrol, Austria) produced 141 complete skeletal remains dated between the 5th/6th and 12th/13th centuries. These skeletons represent one of the largest historical series of human remains ever discovered in the East Alpine region. Little historical information is available for this region and time period. The good state of preservation of these bioarchaeological finds offered the opportunity of performing molecular genetic investigations. Adequate DNA extraction methods were tested in the attempt to obtain as high DNA yields as possible for further analyses. Molecular genetic sex-typing using a dedicated PCR multiplex ("Genderplex") gave interpretable results in 88 remains, 78 of which had previously been sexed based on morphological features. We observed a discrepancy in sex determination between the two methods in 21 cases. An unbiased follow-up morphological examination of these finds showed congruence with the DNA results in all but five samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.