Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23940504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Exome sequencing of index patients with retinal dystrophies as a tool for molecular diagnosis.

Marta Corton, Koji M Nishiguchi, Almudena Avila-Fernández, Konstantinos Nikopoulos, Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez, Sorina D Tatu, Carmen Ayuso, Carlo Rivolta

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta CortonDepartment of Genetics, IIS- Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERER, Madrid, Spain.
Koji M Nishiguchi
Almudena Avila-Fernández
Konstantinos Nikopoulos
Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez
Sorina D Tatu
Carmen Ayuso
Carlo Rivolta
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESUniversity of Lausanne · CHCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal dystrophies (RD) are a group of hereditary diseases that lead to debilitating visual impairment and are usually transmitted as a Mendelian trait. Pathogenic mutations can occur in any of the 100 or more disease genes identified so far, making molecular diagnosis a rather laborious process. In this work we explored the use of whole exome sequencing (WES) as a tool for identification of RD mutations, with the aim of assessing its applicability in a diagnostic context. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe ascertained 12 Spanish families with seemingly recessive RD. All of the index patients underwent mutational pre-screening by chip-based sequence hybridization and resulted to be negative for known RD mutations. With the exception of one pedigree, to simulate a standard diagnostic scenario we processed by WES only the DNA from the index patient of each family, followed by in silico data analysis. We successfully identified causative mutations in patients from 10 different families, which were later verified by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analyses. Specifically, we detected pathogenic DNA variants (∼50% novel mutations) in the genes RP1, USH2A, CNGB3, NMNAT1, CHM, and ABCA4, responsible for retinitis pigmentosa, Usher syndrome, achromatopsia, Leber congenital amaurosis, choroideremia, or recessive Stargardt/cone-rod dystrophy cases. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite the absence of genetic information from other family members that could help excluding nonpathogenic DNA variants, we could detect causative mutations in a variety of genes known to represent a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes in 83% of the patients analyzed. Considering the constant drop in costs for human exome sequencing and the relative simplicity of the analyses made, this technique could represent a valuable tool for molecular diagnostics or genetic research, even in cases for which no genotypes from family members are available.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsExomeExtracellular Matrix ProteinsEye ProteinsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLeber Congenital AmaurosisMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNicotinamide-Nucleotide AdenylyltransferasePedigreeRetinal DystrophiesRetinitis PigmentosaABCA4 protein, humanAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCHM protein, humanCNGB3 protein, humanCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsEye ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNicotinamide-Nucleotide AdenylyltransferaseNMNAT1 protein, humanRP1 protein, humanUSH2A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23940504
PMCPMC3683009
OpenAlexW2012444311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.