Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23940409›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2013

Protecting and improving breastfeeding practices during a major emergency: lessons learnt from the baby tents in Haiti.

Mohamed Ag Ayoya, Kate Golden, Ismael Ngnie-Teta, Marjolein D Moreaux, Aissa Mamadoultaibou, Leslie Koo, Erin Boyd, Jean Max Beauliere, Celine Lesavre, Joseline Pierre Marhone

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Breastfeeding practices among Syrian refugees in Turkey.International breastfeeding journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Emergency and disaster response strategies to support mother-infant dyads during COVID-19.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Child malnutrition in Haiti: progress despite disasters.Global health, science and practice · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed Ag AyoyaNutrition Section, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Country Office, 125 Rue Faubert, Pétionville, Port-au-Prince, Haiti. mayoya@unicef.org
Kate Golden
Ismael Ngnie-Teta
Marjolein D Moreaux
Aissa Mamadoultaibou
Leslie Koo
Erin Boyd
Jean Max Beauliere
Celine Lesavre
Joseline Pierre Marhone
Concern Worldwide · IEGhent University · BEUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversité Notre Dame d'Haïti · HT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemThe 2010 earthquake in Haiti displaced about 1.5 million people, many of them into camps for internally displaced persons. It was expected that disruption of breastfeeding practices would lead to increased infant morbidity, malnutrition and mortality. APPROACH: Haiti's health ministry and the United Nations Children's Fund, in collaboration with local and international nongovernmental organizations, established baby tents in the areas affected by the earthquake. The tents provided a safe place for mothers to breastfeed and for non-breastfed infants to receive ready-to-use infant formula. Such a large and coordinated baby tent response in an emergency context had never been mounted before anywhere in the world. LOCAL

settingBaby tents were set up in five cities but mainly in Port-au-Prince, where the majority of Haiti's 1555 camps for displaced persons had been established. RELEVANT CHANGES: Between February 2010 and June 2012, 193 baby tents were set up; 180 499 mother-infant pairs and 52 503 pregnant women were registered in the baby tent programme. Of infants younger than 6 months, 70% were reported to be exclusively breastfed and 10% of the "mixed feeders" moved to exclusive breastfeeding while enrolled. In 2010, 13.5% of registered infants could not be breastfed. These infants received ready-to-use infant formula. LESSONS LEARNT: Thanks to rapid programme scale-up, breastfeeding practices remained undisrupted. However, better evaluation methods and comprehensive guidance on the implementation and monitoring of baby tents are needed for future emergencies, along with a clear strategy for transitioning baby tent activities into facility and community programmes.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingEarthquakesEmergency ShelterBottle FeedingFemaleHaitiHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID23940409
PMCPMC3738309
OpenAlexW2007129906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.