Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23940261›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2013

Interactions among DIV voltage-sensor movement, fast inactivation, and resurgent Na current induced by the NaVβ4 open-channel blocking peptide.

Amanda H Lewis, Indira M Raman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resurgent Sodium Current in Neurons of the Cerebral Cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of FGF14 and NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in sensory neurons generate slow resurgent currents that are enhanced by inflammatory mediators.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda H LewisInterdepartmental Biological Sciences Program and 2 Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Indira M Raman
Northwestern University · US

Funding

IONIC CURRENTS AND SPIKING IN CEREBELLAR NUCLEAR NEURONSR01NS039395 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAN, INDIRA M · 2000 to 2012
$3.7M
Ionic currents and spiking in cerebellar nuclear neuronsR37NS039395 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAN, INDIRA M · 2014 to 2019
$3.3M
The structural and molecular determinants of resurgent sodium currentF31NS076238 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, AMANDA HALLEY · 2011 to 2014
$73k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS076238NINDS NIH HHS F31-NS076238NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039395NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS39395NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS039395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurgent Na current flows as voltage-gated Na channels recover through open states from block by an endogenous open-channel blocking protein, such as the NaVβ4 subunit. The open-channel blocker and fast-inactivation gate apparently compete directly, as slowing the onset of fast inactivation increases resurgent currents by favoring binding of the blocker. Here, we tested whether open-channel block is also sensitive to deployment of the DIV voltage sensor, which facilitates fast inactivation. We expressed NaV1.4 channels in HEK293t cells and assessed block by a free peptide replicating the cytoplasmic tail of NaVβ4 (the "β4 peptide"). Macroscopic fast inactivation was disrupted by mutations of DIS6 (L443C/A444W; "CW" channels), which reduce fast-inactivation gate binding, and/or by the site-3 toxin ATX-II, which interferes with DIV movement. In wild-type channels, the β4 peptide competed poorly with fast inactivation, but block was enhanced by ATX. With the CW mutation, large peptide-induced resurgent currents were present even without ATX, consistent with increased open-channel block upon depolarization and slower deactivation after blocker unbinding upon repolarization. The addition of ATX greatly increased transient current amplitudes and further enlarged resurgent currents, suggesting that pore access by the blocker is actually decreased by full deployment of the DIV voltage sensor. ATX accelerated recovery from block at hyperpolarized potentials, however, suggesting that the peptide unbinds more readily when DIV voltage-sensor deployment is disrupted. These results are consistent with two open states in Na channels, dependent on the DIV voltage-sensor position, which differ in affinity for the blocking protein.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsIon Channel GatingAnimalsCnidarian VenomsHEK293 CellsHumansMiceMutationNAV1.4 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPeptidesProtein Structure, TertiarySodiumSodium Channel BlockersCnidarian VenomsNAV1.4 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPeptidesScn4a protein, mouseSodiumSodium Channel Blockerstoxin II (Anemonia sulcata)

Identifiers

PMID23940261
PMCPMC3753608
OpenAlexW2060749033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.