Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23940238›Full record

SynthesisPediatrics2013

Home visiting and outcomes of preterm infants: a systematic review.

Neera K Goyal, Angelique Teeters, Robert T Ammerman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neera K GoyalDivision of Neonatology and Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. neera.goyal@cchmc.org
Angelique Teeters
Robert T Ammerman
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences and TrainingUL1TR000077 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., TSEVAT, JOEL · 2012 to 2014
$9.9M
Ohio Interdisciplinary Women's Health Career TrainingK12HD051953 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
Treatment of Maternal Depression in Home Visitation: Mother and Child ImpactsR01MH087499 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI AMMERMAN, ROBERT THOMPSON · 2010 to 2014
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000077NICHD NIH HHS 5K12HD051953-07NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD051953NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087499NIMH NIH HHS R01MH087499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHome visiting is 1 strategy to improve child health and parenting. Since implementation of home visiting trials 2 decades ago, US preterm births (<37 weeks) have risen by 20%. The objective of this study was to review evidence regarding home visiting and outcomes of preterm infants

methodsSearches of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PsycINFO, and Embase were conducted. Criteria for inclusion were (1) cohort or controlled trial designs; (2) home-based, preventive services for infants at medical or social risk; and (3) outcomes reported for infants born preterm or low birth weight (<2500 g). Data from eligible reports were abstracted by 2 reviewers. Random effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data for developmental and parent interaction measures.

resultsSeventeen studies (15 controlled trials, 2 cohort studies) were reviewed. Five outcome domains were identified: infant development, parent-infant interaction, morbidity, abuse/neglect, and growth/nutrition. Six studies (n = 336) demonstrated a pooled standardized mean difference of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.02) in Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment Inventory scores at 1 year in the home-visited groups versus control. Evidence for other outcomes was limited. Methodological limitations were common.

conclusionsReviewed studies suggest that home visiting for preterm infants promotes improved parent-infant interaction. Further study of interventions targeting preterm infants within existing programs may strengthen the impact and cost benefits of home visiting in at-risk populations.

Indexed as

House CallsInfant, Low Birth WeightChild AbuseChild Health ServicesChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesControlled Clinical Trials as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesEducationFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInfantdevelopmenthome visitinglow birth weightparent-child relationshippreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID23940238
PMCPMC3876756
OpenAlexW2150665681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.